Sunday, November 15, 2009

David Horowitz IslamophobiaUS Leftists & Liberals Conspiring With Extremist Muslims ????

Above Racist anti-Muslim Cartoon by David Swindle at Horowitz's RealNewsBlog.

Muslims Against Sharia is associted with Robert Spencer & David Horowitz.
Unhinged Nationalists and racists such as Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, David Horowitz, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Pat Robertson, Sara Palin , Newt Gingrich, Eric Cantor and many more have created an all encompassing overarching conspiracy Theory which includes Muslims, American Liberals, Progressives, Leftist and President Obama who are "Hell bent" on destroying America, Christianity and Judaism and Western Civilization. So argues David Horowitz who created The David Horowitz Freedom Center & and he is connected with Robert Spencer's anti-Islam "Jihad Watch" & "Muslims Against Sharia"

“Fifth Column” is a term that refers to those individuals and organizations that, though they are nominally American, want the United States to lose the War on Terror – the war that Norman Podhoretz and James Woolsey have called “World War IV.” The term “Fifth Column” was coined by a Spanish Civil War General named Emilio Mola. As four columns of his troops advanced on Madrid, he stated confidently that, within the city, he also had a “fifth column”of supporters – those who were aiding, from the inside, his military campaign against the government. Dictionaries generally define a fifth column as “any group of people who give aid and support to the enemy from within their own country.” The current War on Terror is being waged against radical Islam and the socialist Left, a seemingly unlikely alliance of forces brought together by the common bond they share: their hatred for the United States. In word and deed, both of these allies make it plain that they wish to see American society and its way of life crushed by any means necessary.

The Fifth Column foot soldiers of the socialist Left, as identified in this database, justify their opposition to the United States by charging that all American foreign policy is predicated on aggression, racism, imperialistic ambition, greed, and a lust for oil. Thus deeming the U.S. an evil nation unworthy of preservation, they side with America’s enemies in the War on Terror.
Quote by David Horowitz & Co. Fifth Column from website Fifth Column at David Horowitz's Rightwing website

David Horowitz Anti-Muslim :"There are no moderate or trustworthy Muslims all are the spawn of Satan just like the anti-Americans: President Obama and American Liberals"

"What Every American Needs To Know About Jihad"Courtesy HorowitzFreedom Center"

Is Islamic jihad just a harmless form of spiritual struggle — as is often argued by Western apologists for radical Islam? Is Jihadi violence simply a twisted, hijacked version of Islam, rejected by traditional Muslims? The David Horowitz Freedom Center's Terrorism Awareness Project, which seeks to educate Americans, and especially college students about jihad, confronts questions such as these. It has produced a powerful new flash video, What Every American Needs to Know About Jihad. This video is adapted from a pamphlet by Robert Spencer, which puts the threat of jihadist ideology into historical perspective. As Spencer makes clear, the religious imperatives of jihad demand the subjugation or killing of infidels and form the poisoned logic of Islamists' expansionist war against America and the West.

Manfred Rouhs at anti-Muslim Pro Koln Party Rally
Anti-Muslim Neo-Nazi Axel Reitz -"Hitler of Cologne" Associate of Christian Worch
Anti-Muslim Christian Worch Friend of Geert Wilder, David Horowitz, Pam Geller etc.
Islamophobes :Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs with Racist, Nationalist, Fanatical Anti-Muslim Geert Wilders & Robert Spencer of "Jihad Watch"

Alinsky, Beck, Satan and Me
by David Horowitz at David Horowitz Newsrealblog 2009 August 16

The many names of Satan, by the way, are also a model for radicals who camouflage their agendas by alternatively calling themselves Communists, socialists, new leftists, liberals and most consistently progressives. My parents, who were card-carrying Communists, never referred to themselves as Communists but always as “progressives.” The Progressive Party was run by the Communist Party and split off from the Democrats in 1948 (because Harry Truman opposed Stalin), but rejoined the Democrats in the McGovern campaign of 1972 and with the ascension of Barack Obama has become the Democratic Party.

Alinsky’s tribute to Satan as the first radical, and as the model of radicals to come, should cause us to reflect on how Satan tempted Adam and Eve to destroy their paradise. If you rebel and violate the law that has been laid down for you, “You shall be as gods” the serpent told them. You think Rahm Emmanuel was listening?

Illustration of the Devil from Horowitz's article:
"Boring From Within:
Alinsky,Beck, Satan and Me"

The Palestinian terrorists have become the Black Panthers of the contemporary anti-war movement. The leftwing culture celebrates the suicide bombers of women and children as desperate victims of Jewish oppression. Attackers and destroyers of the Oslo peace process are proclaimed as heroes. Terrorists and totalitarian radicals are lionized as fighters for social justice. Israelis and Americans are condemned as Nazis.

How many American college students and antiwar activists have been seduced by these poisonous elements at work in our society? It is difficult to know. But one who has already paid for it with her life is Rachel Corrie, a 24 year old undergraduate at Evergreen College in Olympia Washington, who has become known as the “Saint of Rafiah,” the name of the West Bank town where she died. Evergreen is one of the many leftwing campuses in America, whose values have been turned so upside down by tenured leftists that it recently featured convicted murderer Mumia Abu Jamal as its commencement speaker. (He spoke via tape).
Quote from David Horrowitz at Newsrealblog

Horowitz: My entire book Unholy Alliance:Radical Islam and the American Left is addressed to this question. If leftists are, as you say, for human rights and the Islamo-fascist enemy is Medieval and, well, fascist, then how come the American left went out in force to save Saddam’s bacon? The gravamen of my book which contains a long section called “The Mind of the Left” is that the way to look at the modern left is not through its positive agendas. The left hasn’t had a coherent unifying agenda since the death of Stalinism in 1956. What unifies the left is its anti-Americanism and anti-Israelism, its determination to carry out the destructive part of the revolutionary agenda – bring the mother down, without bothering about what will come next.

What the modern left shares with Islamic radicals is a negative vision: America as the Great Satan, the root of all evil. In the eyes of the Left, America is the guardian of private property everywhere – “globalization” and this has been regarded by leftists as the root of all evil since Rousseau identified it as such. Both Islamicists and leftists have a fantastic vision of the utopian future when the beast is slain. For the Islamicists like Zarqawi this redemptive future is the garden of Allah and 72 virgins; for leftists like Katrina Van Den Heuvel it is “social justice.” For both, the path to an earthly paradise is through the destruction of the Great Satan — which is us.

David Horowitz's Demons: Islamofascism Awareness Week 2007
06:35 - 2 years ago Max Blumenthal storms far-right operative David Horowitz's "Islamfascism Awareness Week" and reveals the personal pathology behind the neocon's divisive event.

Anyway here's a definition of Islamophobia taken from from the Runnymede Trust Institute as found at the website Islamophobia which monitors Hate Speech in which all Muslims are characterized as being violent and out to destroy America and Western Civilization. From: Islamophobia

Runnymede Trust:
The Runnymede Trust has identified eight components that they say define Islamophobia.
This definition, from the 1997 document 'Islamophobia: A Challenge For Us All' is widely accepted, including by the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia.
The eight components are:

1) Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change.
2) Islam is seen as separate and 'other'. It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected by them and does not influence them.
3) Islam is seen as inferior to the West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist.
4) Islam is seen as violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and engaged in a 'clash of civilizations'.
5) Islam is seen as a political ideology and is used for political or military advantage.
6) Criticisms made of the West by Islam are rejected out of hand.
7) Hostility towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.
8) Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural or normal.
Headline Nov. 14,2009 at Horrowitz's Newsrealblog :
"Comment of the Day: The Islamist Dagger Prepares to Slit Our Throats 2009 November 14"

Horowitz even attacks Bill O'Reilly when O'Reilly is trying to sound rational and reasonable. O'Reilly in Horrowitz's view has the audacity to defend Islam as being different from Islamic Extremists who use their religion to justify terrorism.

Why Is It That Even Accurate Commentary About Islam Seems To Involve A Disclaimer? at 2009 November 14

In what appears to be the latest socially acceptable way to condemn Islamo-Fascism while still appearing to be reasonable and inclusive, many commentators have taken to excoriating Terrorists while still reminding the rest of us that Muslims are “good people” who, when it comes right down to it, are “just like us,” with the same wants, goals, likes and dislikes.

Bill O’Reilly has been doing it a lot lately: In his November 11th Talking Points Memo he makes a reasonable case for why Nidal Malik Hasan should be called a “…Muslim terrorist, period. He killed out of blind hatred. He is a villain and there is no excuse for his rampage.”

All well and good.

But then Mr. O’Reilly takes great pains to make sure we comprehend what his central belief is:

“We do, however, continue to believe that most Muslims are good people, and I understand they must be protected, but not to a ridiculous degree”.

May I ask whom they need to be protected from?

He does the same thing later in the program in his Back Of The Book segment with Fox News Anchor Jane Skinner

O’Reilly and Skinner are in total agreement that they disavow Reverend Pat Robertson’s thesis that “Islam is a violent political system bent on the overthrow of the governments of the world.”

...Even Rich Lowry, in an otherwise excellent post in the National Review Online (The PTSD Evasion) makes the argument that

“Obviously, Hasan isn’t a representative American Muslim, nor is his act an indictment of Muslims in the military. We can acknowledge both those things without laboring to obscure the nature of his crime in childish evasions.”

Far be it from me to dispute the efficacy of those types of statements: It’s not like I know a lot of guys down at the local Mosque and hang out with them when their prayers are done for the day.

But it is awful tough to believe a religion whose stated goal is to destroy or enslave anyone who is a non-believer is capable of putting out a lot of devout followers who want to co-exist peacefully with the rest of us.

There might be a couple, or even 10 or 20, or for that matter, more than 2,000. I wish them well and salute their bravery.

But to think that “most” Muslims don’t subscribe to the deadly theology that its Imams and seers and Mullahs advocate is to be, well… a tad naive.

Don’t you think?

and some information on The David Horowitz Freedom Center:
David Horowitz Freedom
Our Mission

The Mission of the David Horowitz Freedom Center is to defend America's free society through educating the public to preserve traditional constitutional values of:

* Individual Freedom
* Rule of Law
* Private Property
* Limited Government

“If to be free is the most important goal of all, then to help someone else to be or to become free must be the most sublime and rewarding of human endeavors.”
—Elie Wiesel, Nobel Laureate
About Us

»David Horowitz
David Horowitz began the Center for the Study of Popular Culture in 1988 to establish a conservative presence in Hollywood and show how popular culture had become a political battleground. Over the next 18 years, CSPC attracted 50,000 contributing supporters and established programs such as The Wednesday Morning Club, the Individual Rights Foundation, and Students for Academic Freedom.

FrontPage Magazine, the Center’s online journal of news and political commentary has 1.5 million visitors and 620,000 unique visitors a month (65 million hits) and is linked to over 2000 other websites., launched in 2005, is the largest publicly accessible database defining the chief groups and individuals of the Left and their organizational interlocks. DTN has had more than 8 million visitors so far this year.

Since 2003, the Center has promoted an Academic Bill of Rights to support students’ academic freedom, and free the American university from political indoctrination and renew its commitment to true intellectual diversity. In 2006, the Center established another organization, Students and Parents for Academic Freedom in K-12 schools, modeled on the university campaign and with the same agenda: to take politics out of the public school classroom.

In 2006, the Center’s Board of Directors decided to change the name of the organization to the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

and from David Horowitz's DiscoverTheNetworks in which he claims to expose the Left-Wing/Liberal & Progressives Conspiracy in America- he suspects anyone who is in favor of human rights, social justice or concerned about poverty, homelessness, women 's rights-odd how these fanatics like David Horowitz is so concerned about the Rights of Muslim women yet they are against anyone fighting for the rights of all women in America these Neocons and their Religious Right Brethern are always fighting against the rights of women, children, Muslims, Blacks, Latinos etc. to them someone who sets up rape counseling or providing safe space for Battered Women they are characterized as being anti-American and anti-Christian.
For instance these consrvatives characterize any one who is a pacifist including all Amish,Menonites, Quakers etc. as UnAmerican pro-Communist & by extension Pro-Islamic Terrorism.

This section examines groups that promote a variety of leftwing causes. Some categories overlap (e.g., Civil Liberties and Anti-Patriot). They are listed separately for the convenience of researchers. DiscoverTheNetworks is a work-in-progress, and the database will be expanded over time.



And here are some excerpts from David Horowitz's series of articles on the Liberal/Progressive Conspiracy in America:

"Alinsky, Beck, Satan and Me" by David Horowitz at David Horowitz Newsrealblog 2009 August 16

The many names of Satan, by the way, are also a model for radicals who camouflage their agendas by alternatively calling themselves Communists, socialists, new leftists, liberals and most consistently progressives. My parents, who were card-carrying Communists, never referred to themselves as Communists but always as “progressives.” The Progressive Party was run by the Communist Party and split off from the Democrats in 1948 (because Harry Truman opposed Stalin), but rejoined the Democrats in the McGovern campaign of 1972 and with the ascension of Barack Obama has become the Democratic Party.

Alinsky’s tribute to Satan as the first radical, and as the model of radicals to come, should cause us to reflect on how Satan tempted Adam and Eve to destroy their paradise. If you rebel and violate the law that has been laid down for you, “You shall be as gods” the serpent told them. You think Rahm Emmanuel was listening?

Part 2 (and again the right has discoverd what's wrong and what causes it the answer is that the attitudes of progressives results from a rejection of traditional religious faiths and a rejection of God acceptance of moral and cultural relativism -he goes on to explain how Progressive environmentalist )

...What they are trying to do is not to improve the lot of all of us or even some of us, but to fill up a cosmic emptiness, an emptiness they feel in their core. As Alinsky himself puts it, they are seeking to answer the question “Why am I here?” — a question which traditional religions attempt to answer but whose answers radicals scorn. Modern radicalism is a secular religion, and its hunger for meaning and hope and change cannot be satisfied by anything less than grandiose, totalizing schemes to transform the world. To bring up their failures, the enormities they are guilty of, the crimes committed in the name of their religion, is to strike a blow at hope itself, which is why they cannot and will not hear it.

One kind of hell or another is what radicalism — progressivism — has in fact achieved since the beginning of the modern age when it conducted the first genocide during the French Revolution. In a fever of revolutionary enthusiasm the Jacobins had changed the name of the cathedral of Notre Dame to the “Temple of Reason,” and then in the name of Reason proceeded to slaughter every Catholic in the Vendee region to purge superstition from the earth.

It was the precursor of Lenin’s destruction of 100,000 churches in the Soviet Union and the creation of a People’s Church to usher in the kingdom of socialist heaven, which led to the murder of 100 million people in Russia and China and the bankrupting of a continent before it mercifully collapsed — with progressives cheering it all the way and mourning over its demise. It was also the precursor of Pol Pot’s decree that every Cambodian who wore glasses be killed in order that Cambodia be rid of bad ideas.

and he goes on to detail the evils and damage caused by Progressives to create a Utopian society:

The crusade to rid mankind of the scourge of DDT launched by the American environmentalist Rachel Carson wound up killing 100 million children — mainly black Africans under the age of 5 — between 1975 and the present, and the killing is still going on. The crusade of the left to liberate gays from a “sex-negative culture” destroyed the public health system’s ability to control domestic epidemics and led to the deaths of more than 300,000 gay men in the prime of life.

The left’s crusade to build a welfare utopia destroyed the inner-city black family, spawned tens of millions of fatherless black children, and created a mass intractable and violent underclass which is still with us and growing today.

The leftist monopoly of the public school system in America’s major cities is daily destroying the lives of millions of poor black and Hispanic children while filling the coffers of the Democratic Party machine which keeps their oppression going.

But progressives never stop for a moment to look at the horrors they have wrought.

Boring From Within: Alinsky, Beck, Satan and Me, Part III

Make no mistake, this — a totalitarian future — is the real objective of Alinsky and his radical disciples who call themselves liberals and bore from within. Alinsky writes of “the “revolutionary force” of the 1960s, that its activists were “one moment reminiscent of the idealistic early Christians yet they also urge violence and cry ‘Burn the system down.!’ They have no illusions about the system, but plenty of illusions about the way to change our world. It is to this point that I have written this book.” Radicals who call for burning down America’s democracy “have no illusions about the system”! They just don’t know how to go about doing it.

Alinsky’s book could be called Machiavellian Rules for Radicals, because it is all about deception, about keeping others in the dark about your intentions until it is too late. Alinsky even acknowledges Machiavelli as his model: “What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be.” These are the famous lines that Michelle Obama made in her own Democratic Convention speech.

...“This failure of many of our younger activists to understand the art of communication has been disastrous,” writes Alinsky. What he really means is their failure to understand the art of mis-communication. This is the art that teaches radicals who are trying impose a socialist health care system in a country whose people understand that socialism destroys freedom, not to sell it as socialism, but to sell it as a “public option,” or as “Medicare for all.”

What this adds up to is a call to revolutionaries who want to destroy the system, to first work within the system until you can accumulate enough power to destroy it. In the movement, we used to call this the strategy of “boring from within.” Like termites, you eat away at the foundations until the building collapses.

Alinsky’s advice is: Don’t confront the system as an opposing army; join it and undermine it as a fifth column force: “‘That means working within the system.” That means that “any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people.”

It is first necessary to sell the public on “change,” the “audacity of hope,” and “yes we can.” You do this by proposing moderate changes which open the door to your radical agendas. Says Alinsky:

“Remember: once you organize people around something as commonly agreed upon as pollution, then an organized people is on the move. From there it’s a short and natural step to political pollution, to Pentagon pollution.”

Seah Hannity Fox news David Horowitz still trying to rewrite the history of Vietnam that in fact the War in Vietnam was won but Liberals & Progressives undermined that victory & now they are applying this fact to the War in Afghanistan- it is a matter of political will so if Obama decides to he can win - how by massacring millions using as much fire-power and bombs as used in that war on Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos etc.

"The Clock Is Ticking, Mr. President by Calvin Freiburger" at
2009 November 14

As the sane portion of the country looks on in disbelief at the Obama Administration’s decision to give 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed a civilian trial in New York City, the conduct of the War on Terror aborad is equally jarring—three months after General Stanley McChrystal has asked for an additioanl 40,000 troops to properly continue operations in Afghanistan, the President still has yet to make up his mind. Last night, Sean Hannity aired an eye-opening report on one of the influences behind Obama’s foreign policy: Lessons in Disaster by Gordon Goldstein.


"Brigitte Gabriel Takes the Gloves Off on Fort Hood and CAIR" – by Jamie Glazov Nov. 15,2009(Brigitte Gabriel, founder of the nonprofit organization ACT! for America)

"Jihad Watch Facebook" Robert Spencer

"Andy McCarthy Identifies the Problem with Prosecuting Terrorists as Civilians: It Empowers the Jihad" by David Swindle at Newsrealblog.comNov. 14, 2009

(Non) Muslims Against Sharia at Chasing Evil March 9,2009

The Million Muslim March? by Jamie Glasov at David Horowitz's Newsrealblog 2009 November 12

Reform Islam at

Our goals are to educate Muslims about dangers presented by Islamic religious texts and why Islam must be reformed; to educate non-Muslims about the differences between moderate Muslims and Islamists (a.k.a. Islamic Religious Fanatics, Radical Muslims, Muslim Fundamentalists, Islamic Extremists or Islamofascists); to educate both Muslims and non-Muslims alike that Moderate Muslims are also targets of Islamic Terror

No comments: