Thursday, January 24, 2013

Robert Burn's Day: Paolo Nutini A Man's A Man' for a' that -Shall Brothers Be For' A'That

A song for Burn's Day

Then let us pray that come it may,
(As come it will for a' that,)
That Sense and Worth, o'er a' the earth,
Shall bear the gree, an' a' that.
For a' that, an' a' that,
It's coming yet for a' that,
That Man to Man, the world o'er,
Shall brothers be for a' that.

Paolo Nutini A Man's A Man' for 'a that





Robert Burns 1795
Type: Song
Tune: For a' that.

Is there for honest Poverty
That hings his head, an' a' that;
The coward slave-we pass him by,
We dare be poor for a' that!
For a' that, an' a' that.
Our toils obscure an' a' that,
The rank is but the guinea's stamp,
The Man's the gowd for a' that.

What though on hamely fare we dine,
Wear hoddin grey, an' a that;
Gie fools their silks, and knaves their wine;
A Man's a Man for a' that:
For a' that, and a' that,
Their tinsel show, an' a' that;
The honest man, tho' e'er sae poor,
Is king o' men for a' that.

Ye see yon birkie, ca'd a lord,
Wha struts, an' stares, an' a' that;
Tho' hundreds worship at his word,
He's but a coof for a' that:
For a' that, an' a' that,
His ribband, star, an' a' that:
The man o' independent mind
He looks an' laughs at a' that.

A prince can mak(e) a belted knight,
A marquis, duke, an' a' that;
But an honest man's abon his might,
Gude(Good) faith, he maunna fa' that!
For a' that, an' a' that,
Their dignities an' a' that;
The pith o' sense, an' pride o' worth,
Are higher rank than a' that.

Then let us pray that come it may,
(As come it will for a' that,)
That Sense and Worth, o'er a' the earth,
Shall bear the gree, an' a' that.
For a' that, an' a' that,
It's coming yet for a' that,
That Man to Man, the world o'er,
Shall brothers be for a' that.
-------
This poem by Robert Burns I hold as being the ideal we should all seek .

And here's my own lament :

If all are in the end equal then each deserves respect , dignity and justice.
But as always we live in an age that only respects wealth and power.
The people who control Wall Street and those who sees themselves entitled to more than others lord it over the rest of us. They define what success is and what is of worth and what is not. Honesty, integrity, morality , compassion, kindness, altruism, empathy they tell us are just a waste of time when winning is all that counts.

Meanwhile others do without who sometimes suffer having lost their livelihood, their homes, their sense of worth and dignity in a culture that speaks of freedom yet what is freedom when their is hunger and desperation and the others dine and we grovel just for a few crumbs their table.

While those in power dine and attend the rich man's ball while millions do without
While millions cower in the dark as the Drones keep flying and the bombs keep dropping.

While Children are torn to shreds their lives cut short in the name of the Empire and the Emperor sheds phony tears .

While glorious cities are turned to ruins and the streets littered with the dead.

While round the globe each waits for the knock on the door at 3 AM followed by blind rage and ignorance fathers and sons shot and sisters, daughters and mothers violated in the name of the ' Eternal Empire of Men ' who truly live in darkness.

While the Emperor he fills his coffers and those of his friends and tells another generation to wait a little more .

And each Emperor meaning well or not repeats this same refrain til the people rise and the peasants and the shop keepers demand their fair share no more no less.

When those of little means are scorned and treated as fools and the lords sit upon their diamond encrusted golden thrones spouting cliches as if they were wise.
This one day will be a sign to take what those in lofty towers of steel and glass refuse to share.

For more on the life and works of Robert Burns check out Burn's Country


and one more poem I wish to share which could be dedicated to those in power in Canada and America and Europe who's only desire is more wealth and power and fame while stealing what they can from each nation's coffers :

Robert Burns "Such a Parcel of Rogues" Poem animation



Uploaded on 9 Jun 2011
Heres a virtual movie of the great Scots poet Robert Burns reading his bitter but beautiful poem more often heard these days as a folk song "Such a Parcel of Rogues" Written in 1791.Such a Parcel of Rogues in a Nation is a Scottish folk song whose lyrics are taken from an eponymous Robert Burns poem of 1791. It derides those members of the Parliament of Scotland who signed the Act of Union with England in 1707, comparing their treachery to the country with the tradition of martial valor and resistance commonly associated with such historic figures as Robert the Bruce and William Wallace. It has continued to be associated with Scottish nationalism and also been referenced in other situations where politicians' actions have gone against popular opinion.

Written in 1791, Such a Parcel of Rogues in a Nation is Robert Burns' famous poem on the 1707 Acts of Union, which joined the parliaments of England and Scotland to create the nation of Great Britain.

It contains the lines 'We're bought and sold for English gold' -- \ Such a parcel of rogues in a nation! echoing the sentiment that Scottish landowners, bankrupted in part by the disastrous Darien Scheme, sold out the Scottish nation for their own financial gain. The melody and lyrics were published in James Hogg's Jacobite Reliques of 1817 (no. 36).

Robert Burns (25 January 1759 -- 21 July 1796) (also known as Rabbie Burns, Scotland's favourite son, the Ploughman Poet, Robden of Solway Firth, the Bard of Ayrshire and in Scotland as simply The Bard[1][2]) was a Scottish poet and a lyricist. He is widely regarded as the national poet of Scotland, and is celebrated worldwide. He is the best known of the poets who have written in the Scots language, although much of his writing is also in English and a "light" Scots dialect, accessible to an audience beyond Scotland. He also wrote in standard English, and in these his political or civil commentary is often at its most blunt.

Kind Regards

Jim Clark

All rights are reserved on this video recording copyright Jim Clark 2011

and so it goes,
GORD.

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Obama's Dirty Wars The Drones Keep Flying And Innocent People Keep Dying


President Obama's speeches are usually stirring and stellar examples of oratory but are in the end are made up of empty promises and phony victories.

Democracy Now! Dirty Wars
Dirty Wars: Jeremy Scahill & Rick Rowley's New Film Exposes Hidden Truths of Covert U.S. Warfare 1/2

Published on 22 Jan 2013

DemocracyNow.org - Premiering this week at the Sundance Film Festival in Utah, the new documentary, "Dirty Wars: The World Is a Battlefield," follows investigative reporter Jeremy Scahill to Afghanistan, Somalia and Yemen as he chases down the hidden truths behind America's expanding covert wars. We're joined by Scahill and the film's director, Rick Rowley, an independent journalist with Big Noise Films. "We're looking right now at a reality that President Obama has essentially extended the very policies that many of his supporters once opposed under President Bush," says Scahill, author of the bestseller "Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army," and a forthcoming book named after his film. "One of the things that humbles both of us is [when] you arrive at a village in Afghanistan and knock on someone's door, you're the first American they've seen since the Americans that kicked that door in and killed half their family," Rowley says. "We promised them that we would do everything we could to make their stories be heard in the U.S. -- finally, we're able to keep those promises."

Watch this interview uninterrupted: http://www.democracynow.org/2013/1/22/dirty_wars_jeremy_scahill_and_rick





President Obama following the path of George W. Bush believes there are no restrictions on the Presidency that whatever the president does by definition under American law is therefore legal. If the United nations were an international body with real integrity and not run by a handful of countries including the USA America could be chastised by a UN resolution or even making Americans face charges of war crimes and if the US refuses it should be deemed a rogue state and tossed out of the United nations. But the way the UN actually works the United States is considered untouchable and is given 'carte blanche' and as it were absolute legal immunity.

Obama to avoid criticism and charges of contravening American law besides breaking international law and being open to charges of war crimes has now given a more formal legal veneer for his use of Drones which result in large numbers of civilian casualties. Yes they are civilian casualties ie human beings and not merely 'Collateral Damage' as the US government and media refer to those ripped to shreds by cluster bombs dropped on them by American Drones.

Unfortunately most liberals who are pro-Obama refuse to take a hard look at the policies of president Obama. If Bush employed these policies liberals would be protesting in the media and on the streets but those same liberals think it is unseemly for liberals or progressives to fiercely and passionately oppose some of Obama's policies. Many liberals having been duped by Obama really believed that when he was pulling troops out of Iraq that he was doing so voluntarily.

In fact the Iraqi government told Obama if his troops stayed they would no longer enjoy immunity from Iraq's courts and so where and when necessary US soldiers and US mercenaries could be charged with crimes and then brought to trial in Iraq.

So Obama was upset but he put a new Public Relations Spin on US troops forced to leave and changed it into War Is Over America won and the Troops are coming home. Which was a lot of malarkey. And the wishywashy fence sitting liberals buy into it unable to face the truth. The truth is America had no right to be in Iraq in the first place and that America had no right to destroy most of Iraq's infrastructure and to make it unlivable and to have murdered over 1 million Iraqis . Most Americans and Western nations couldn't care less over the deaths of these foreigners who are different from Westerners in some undefined way and who have a different religion.

Obama's 'Playbook' for Targeted Strikes Has a Gaping Hole--CIA's Killer Drones in Pakistan Exempted by Alex Kane , at Alternet.org, January 23, 2013

The CIA's deadly campaign of drone strikes in the tribal areas of Pakistan will be exempt from the Obama administration's attempt to codify rules for targeted killings.

The Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) campaign of drone strikes in tribal areas in Pakistan will continue to run wild in the coming year. A “playbook” for how the U.S. conducts targeted killing operations by drone that is nearly completed will exempt the CIA’s drone strikes in Pakistan, making the “playbook” essentially useless, considering that the vast majority of strikes occur in Pakistan.

The Washington Post, which reported the news over the weekend, noted that the exemption “would allow the CIA to continue pounding al-Qaeda and Taliban targets for a year or more before the agency is forced to comply with more stringent rules spelled out in a classified document that officials have described as a counterterrorism ‘playbook.’” The desire to codify the U.S.’s drone strike and targeted killing programs have accelerated in recent months, leading critics to say the Obama administration has prepared the ground for perpetual war by drone.

The codification of rules is “a step in exactly the wrong direction, a further bureaucratization of the CIA’s paramilitary killing program,” the American Civil Liberties Union’s Hina Shamsi told the Post.

The subjects covered in the “playbook,” which would cover drone strikes in Yemen, Somalia and elsewhere, include “the legal principles that govern when U.S. citizens can be targeted overseas and the sequence of approvals required when the CIA or U.S. military conducts drone strikes outside war zones.”

But the numbers of drone strikes in Yemen and Somalia pale in comparison to the CIA’s strikes in Pakistan. According to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, which closely tracks the drone program, the Obama administration carried out 300 strikes in Pakistan during his first term. Given the fact that drone strikes in Yemen from 2002-2013 were carried out about 50 times, it’s clear that Pakistan is the epicenter of the campaign. The strikes in Pakistan carried out by the Obama administration have killed 2,152 people, including 290 civilians, leading to immense anger at the U.S. and the president. Islamists trying to carry out attacks on the United States have cited drone strikes as a core motivation.

Chris Hedges criticizes US foreign policy which is imperialistic and if anything anti-democracy which doesn't make America any safer and just leads to more military interventions more wars more killing and this leads to more 'blowback'.

America is not hated for its wealth or freedoms ; it is hated for its war mongering for its ruthless and brutal disregard for the lives of other people. America still hasn't managed to get beyond its history of gun boat diplomacy. Now the gun boats are replaced by helicopter gun-ships and armed drones and planes that bomb from 20,000 feet.

The War in the Shadows By Chris Hedges August 21, 2012 "TruthDig" via Information Clearing House


The killers and the paymasters, the spies and gangsters, the terrorists and jihadists, on all sides of the divide, have grown in numbers to carry out a vast war in the shadows. They are determined to perpetuate the senseless violence and mayhem that are the currency of their profession. And they make peace and diplomacy impossible. That is their goal. Sen. Frank Church in 1975, after chairing a Senate committee investigation into U.S. intelligence activities, defined “covert action” as a “semantic disguise for murder, coercion, blackmail, bribery, the spreading of lies, and consorting with known torturers and international terrorists.”

The multitudes of crimes these killers, torturers, kidnappers, propagandists, special operations units and spies have carried out in our name are well known to those outside our gates. There are hundreds of millions of people who have a tragic intimacy with the twisted and brutal soul of American imperialism. Okinawans. Guatemalans. Cubans. Congolese. Brazilians. Argentines. Indonesians. Iranians. Palestinians. Panamanians. Vietnamese. Cambodians. Filipinos. South Koreans. Taiwanese. Nicaraguans. Salvadorans. Afghans. Iraqis. Yemenis. Somalis. They can all tell us who we are, if we can listen. But we do not. We are as ignorant, gullible and naive as children. We celebrate fictitious red-white-and-blue virtues while our clandestine armies, which at times achieve short-term objectives but always finally plunge us deeper into violence, have steadily weakened and discredited the nation as well as the purported values for which it stands. These clandestine armies travel the globe, awash in hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, sowing dragon’s teeth that rise up later, like the warriors in the myth of the Golden Fleece, to become mirror images of our own monstrosities.

And Glenn Greenwald exposes President Obama's policy of 'double taps' by Drones to kill anyone who appears just after the first drone strike .

US Drone Strikes Target Rescuers in Pakistan – and the West Stays Silent by Glenn Greenwald,via Information Clearing House Aug. 20,2012

Attacking rescuers – a tactic long deemed by the US a hallmark of terrorism – is now routinely used by the Obama administration

But attacking rescuers (and arguably worse, bombing funerals of America's drone victims) is now a tactic routinely used by the US in Pakistan. In February, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism documented that "the CIA's drone campaign in Pakistan has killed dozens of civilians who had gone to help rescue victims or were attending funerals." Specifically: "at least 50 civilians were killed in follow-up strikes when they had gone to help victims." That initial TBIJ report detailed numerous civilians killed by such follow-up strikes on rescuers, and established precisely the terror effect which the US government has long warned are sown by such attacks:

"Yusufzai, who reported on the attack, says those killed in the follow-up strike 'were trying to pull out the bodies, to help clear the rubble, and take people to hospital.' The impact of drone attacks on rescuers has been to scare people off, he says: 'They've learnt that something will happen. No one wants to go close to these damaged building anymore.'"

Since that first bureau report, there have been numerous other documented cases of the use by the US of this tactic: "On [4 June], US drones attacked rescuers in Waziristan in western Pakistan minutes after an initial strike, killing 16 people in total according to the BBC. On 28 May, drones were also reported to have returned to the attack in Khassokhel near Mir Ali." Moreover, "between May 2009 and June 2011, at least 15 attacks on rescuers were reported by credible news media, including the New York Times, CNN, ABC News and Al Jazeera."

In June, the UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial killings, summary or arbitrary executions, Christof Heyns, said that if "there have been secondary drone strikes on rescuers who are helping (the injured) after an initial drone attack, those further attacks are a war crime." There is no doubt that there have been.

(A different UN official, the UN special rapporteur on human rights and counterterrorism, Ben Emmerson, this weekend demanded that the US "must open itself to an independent investigation into its use of drone strikes or the United Nations will be forced to step in", and warned that the demand "will remain at the top of the UN political agenda until some consensus and transparency has been achieved". For many American progressives, caring about what the UN thinks is so very 2003.)

The frequency with which the US uses this tactic is reflected by this December 2011 report from ABC News on the drone killing of 16-year-old Tariq Khan and his 12-year-old cousin Waheed, just days after the older boy attended a meeting to protest US drones:

"Asked for documentation of Tariq and Waheed's deaths, Akbar did not provide pictures of the missile strike scene. Virtually none exist, since drones often target people who show up at the scene of an attack."

Not only does that tactic intimidate rescuers from helping the wounded and removing the dead, but it also ensures that journalists will be unwilling to go to the scene of a drone attack out of fear of a follow-up attack.

This has now happened yet again this weekend in Pakistan, which witnessed what Reuters calls "a flurry of drone attacks" that "pounded northern Pakistan over the weekend", "killing 13 people in three separate attacks". The attacks "came as Pakistanis celebrate the end of the holy month of Ramadan with the festival of Eid al-Fitr." At least one of these weekend strikes was the type of "double tap" explosion aimed at rescuers which, the US government says, is the hallmark of Hamas:

"At least six militants were killed when US drones fired missiles twice on Sunday in North Waziristan Agency.

"In the first strike, four missiles were fired on two vehicles in the Mana Gurbaz area of district Shawal in North Waziristan Agency, while two missiles were fired in the second strike at the same site where militants were removing the wreckage of their destroyed vehicles."

An unnamed Pakistani official identically told Agence France-Presse that a second US drone "fired two missiles at the site of this morning's attack, where militants were removing the wreckage of their two destroyed vehicles". (Those killed by US drone attacks in Pakistan are more or less automatically deemed "militants" by unnamed "officials", and then uncritically called such by most of the western press – a practice that inexcusably continues despite revelations that the Obama administration has redefined "militants" to mean "all military-age males in a strike zone".)

and so it goes,
GORD.


Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Obama's Imperialism Betraying Progressive Supporters :Jeremy Scahill Obama's Secret Prisons ,Renditions, Torture & Drone Attacks Creating More Terrorists While Crushing and Silencing Dissent In America

Martin Luther King Jr. had a dream not just of a society where racism was no longer tolerated but a nation dedicated to real justice and the rule of law in which no one would be exempt from the law. President Obama's agenda directly contravenes these principles as those in high places and those rich enough are exempted from the law by President Obama.

Obama's drone attacks will come back to bite America  

Published on 10 Jan 2013
The illegal assassinations and slaughter of innocent civilians, including hundreds of the children, has become the hallmark of President Obama's war policies. Rather than making America more secure, it is a policy that will inevitably cause blowback against the United States, by relatives and communities who have suffered loss seeking revenge for the killing of their loved ones.


Obama's Secret CIA Dungeon In Somalia Violates His Own Executive Order! - YouTube
Jeremy Scahill on secret prisons and programs. Obama continues various Bush Regime's tactics such as renditions, torture, Drone attacks, bombing more countries, killing more civilians without any apologies or remorse etc. President Obama in the end appears to believe whatever America does is by definition justified including targeted assassinations and bombing civilians in Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen etc. This story is ignored by most of the Mainstream Media and progressives and other supporters of Obama refuse to call out President Obama's lies and hypocrisy on these issues. If anything Obama has expanded the Global War on Terror .


 

And Cenk Uygur at The Young Turks weighs in  on Jeremy Scahill's report on drone attacks.
Note Cenk also mentions the so-called Double-Taps in which after a first strike once people appear to attempt to give aid to those wounded the USA then directs a second attack on the rescuers .
Cenk also notes that Obama has instituted a new way of deciding on who or who is not an innocent civilians or are combatants . Obama claims any male over 15 years old is counted as an enemy combatant without offering any evidence.

Obama Drone Strikes Are 'Mass Murder' - Jeremy Scahill

Published on 4 Jun 2012
"Weighing in on President Obama's targeted drone strikes in the Middle East, journalist Jeremy Scahill did not mince words. During his appearance on MSNBC's "Up With Chris Hayes" Saturday morning, Scahill repeatedly said that such attacks, when they killed innocent civilians, amounted to "murder"...".* The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur breaks it down.



 It is time now that Obama has begun his second term in office to put his feet to the fire and make him live up to his promises made in 2008 and before that when he said he wanted to bring about real change. 

And further President Obama is now in the same category of rogue presidents such as Nixon, Reagan, Bush 1 & 2. We expected no more from these other presidents since they were outspoken and dedicated conservatives while Obama pretends to be in favor of real substantive changes in line with Liberal and Progressive ideology instead he is at the end of the day on the side of the status quo. This explains his disinterest in the reform of the racist Justice system or the racist privatized money making prison industrial complex.

It appears to matter little to Obama that due to endemic racist ideology throughout America and its policing , court , prison system that blacks and Latino are disproportionately represented in the Prison Industrial System.  Just because Obama happens to be black does not mean that he is on the side of poor blacks or Latinos . He is like his white counterparts interested only in the well to do successful blacks in America.

The Wall Street gang of thugs and snake oil sellers get to rob as they please knowing in the end the US government will protect them except for a few necessary examples to create the phony public relations necessary so it looks as if the President was a man of his word which he in fact is not anymore than George W. Bush or Dick Cheney were.

 The lies and propaganda have continued un-abetted under the Obama Regime which has sold out to the highest bidders. Obama has sold out to Wall Street and the Intelligence-Security Military Industrial Complex . Rather than reduce the budgets of the US military and the National Security complex Obama is trying to sell one compromise after another with the Republican Party and the Rich and powerful as he ignores the needs of millions of Americans.

 President Obama has continued and in a number of cases expanded and doubled down on many of the worst Bush policies under the guise of National Security and in the so-called Global War on Terror which more and more looks like the American Empire expanding and exerting its power over larger areas of the world. Obama like those presidents before him believes that America has the right to intervene militarily in whatever nation it wants to.

The American ethos has been that it does not recognize the sovereignty of other nations and that it believes International Law does not apply to America. Yet the Liberal and Progressive voices in the USA are mostly silent afraid of offending President Obama and /or the Democratic Party. Obama has proven himself time and again as the defender not of change but of the status quo.

At the moment Obama is on the Gun Control bandwagon which makes him look like he's taking bold action but in fact on numerous other issues he is not that much better than George W. Bush. Obama 's foreign policies seem to follow in lockstep with the Neoconservative foreign and domestic policies the Neoconservatives championed during the Bush administration.




As we saw during the bigger protests by the Occupy Movement Obama saw nothing wrong with the police forces brutally cracking down on the protesters in a similar fashion though not as deadly as was done in the  nation of Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, Libya, Syria and Iran etc But the motives in the USA and in those aforementioned nations are the same to crush dissent to promote the idea that those protesting are the one's committing violence and that protesters are considered unAmerican and even as they were during protests against the War in Iraq or the War in Vietnam are seen as anti-American and as somehow giving aid and comfort to America's enemies .

Obama shows his dismissive attitude towards the Occupy Movement and the unwarranted arrestss of over 4,000 Occupy Protesters . Obama feigns his concern which of course doesn't include federal investigations of the police crackdown on Occupy Wall Street protests.

We saw the same sort of police response to protesters during the Civil Rights Movement and even then the federal government rarely too action against specific police officers or police forces often ignoring these incidents until the outcry was too great and they were forced to respond.

OBAMA AND OCCUPY WALL STREET POLICE BRUTALITY



Uploaded on 24 Nov 2011
You have to love the Occupy Wall Street movement's growing presence, and you also have to love Obama's classy, thoughtful, and seemingly concerned response to the group that mic checked him yesterday, as well as his response to some of the concerns of the Occupy movement later in his speech.

As Beth Buczynzski of sister site Insteading and of Care2 writes, "The President didn't belittle the protesters by trying to shout over them as so many others have done. Instead, he silenced the crowd's boos and allowed the OWS group to deliver its message."

Nonetheless, it's important to note that Obama made widely televised remarks earlier this year saying that violence should not be used on protesters in Egypt. However, despite tons of police brutality and over 4,000 arrests in the U.S. in response to the Occupy movement, Obama hasn't made any similar statements.
Note that there has been loss of life in the Occupy movement now — a kicked and pepper-sprayed pregnant woman has lost her child; an 84-year-old woman has also been pepper sprayed; and an Iraq war veteran has had his skull fractured; and much more violence has been inflicted upon peaceful protesters - 23 November 2011.



Occupy Oakland Police Brutality


Published on 20 Dec 2012
Occupy Oakland Police Brutality



Shocking police brutality at Berkeley 11/9/11 Occupy Wall Street 


Is this sort of attack on American dissidents also a part of Obama's legacy . Obama defends police across the USA in their most egregious acts by his silence and by not putting pressure on the Department of Justice to address these issues in a timely and real fashion and not merely another Obama Public Relations Photo-op while he gives a wink and a nod to the police across the USA.

 And here's an indictment against the NYPD and their brutal treatment of Occupy protesters and by extension of the Obama administration of taking no stand during the last year and half of Occupy protests being brutally stomped out in a federally led coordinated attack on Occupy protests..

But in reality it is no surprise that Obama is almost always on the side of the status quo and the elites and including police forces no matter what they do. Lawrence O'Donnell Attacks the NYPD and other American police forces who believe they are above the law and unfortunately the polioce are usually right about this as Mayors, governors, legislatures, the DOJ, the FBI and the Federal government including the White House ignore or cover up such activities .
Occupy Wall Street- MSNBC Reporter SLAMS NYPD Police Brutality!!! Uploaded on 4 Dec 2011 September 26, 2011 MSNBC OMG MSNBC reporter is going OFF! A Rant Like You've Never Heard Before! 100 Million Thumbs UP!!! Lets support this guy (who will probably lose his job or end up "committing suicide" mysteriously in the next 5 years..sigh) He's standing up for what's Right! (And standing Against all thats Wrong!) LETS SUPPORT HIM! SPREAD SPREAD SPREAD!!


Unfortunately with President Obama as president many progressives and liberals give Obama a free pass when he engages in tactics similar to those of the former Bush Regime. Whenever Bush was discovered to be allowing torture, renditions, committing various atrocities and ignoring the unwarranted deaths of thousands or hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians Progressives and Liberals took President Bush to task in the media and organizing protest marches..

But when President Obama ignores international law or even the laws of the USA abusing POWs or individuals arrested for leaking information to the press and the public or his targeted Assassinations and the wanton murder of innocent civilians and expanding the Global War On Terror or supporting extremist in various countries ie Libya, Syria etc.the Progressives and liberals who should be outraged instead act as defenders of any and all policies of the Obama administration.

When it comes to the attacks on Occupy by police forces we discover that the crackdown was a result of a coordinated disinformation propaganda assault on Occupy protests across the USA. It seems inconceivable that Obama was not aware of this coordinated action on the part of the FBI, Homeland Security and other federal departments, agencies and government staff members which may in fact include members of the executive branch and the President Himself.
OBAMA AND OCCUPY WALL STREET POLICE BRUTALITY Uploaded on 24 Nov 2011 You have to love the Occupy Wall Street movement's growing presence, and you also have to love Obama's classy, thoughtful, and seemingly concerned response to the group that mic checked him yesterday, as well as his response to some of the concerns of the Occupy movement later in his speech.
As Beth Buczynzski of sister site Insteading and of Care2 writes, "The President didn't belittle the protesters by trying to shout over them as so many others have done. Instead, he silenced the crowd's boos and allowed the OWS group to deliver its message." Nonetheless, it's important to note that Obama made widely televised remarks earlier this year saying that violence should not be used on protesters in Egypt. However, despite tons of police brutality and over 4,000 arrests in the U.S. in response to the Occupy movement, Obama hasn't made any similar statements.
Note that there has been loss of life in the Occupy movement now — a kicked and pepper-sprayed pregnant woman has lost her child; an 84-year-old woman has also been pepper sprayed; and an Iraq war veteran has had his skull fractured; and much more violence has been inflicted upon peaceful protesters - 23 November 2011.


The problem of police brutality in the USA goes beyond just the Occupy Protests as the police forces have become militarized and see themselves at war with a significant portion of America's citizens- ie poor and black and Latino etc.

Epidemic Of Police Brutality Against Children & The Poor In U.S. And Obama Says Nothing

 

Monday, January 21, 2013

A Message To President Obama: Martin Luther King, "Why I Am Opposed to the War in Vietnam"


"The United States is (still) the greatest purveyor of violence in the world." MLK


Today's News items:

* Martin Luther King's Anti-Vietnam War speech
* The irony of Obama's pro-war policies on MLK day
*Obama's continuing of Bush Policies such as renditions, torture, Drones,  targeted assassinations, indiscriminate bombing of civilians -using weapons banned by the majority of nations such as land mines, Cluster bombs, incendiary weapons White phosphorus , revenge killings, disproportionate retaliations , using secret prisons for POWs etc.
* Obama still employs notorious Blackwater mercenaries who are accountable to no one

When Martin Luther King questioned the legitimacy of the War on Vietnam he was vilified by the Mainstream Media and ever since Martin Luther King's stance on the Vietnam War has been muted and ignored by the Mainstream Media and ignored now by President Obama who at times puts a different spin on MLK's anti-war stance.

MLK no matter what Obama's opinion was anti-war and would be against the current notion in Washington that the USA is at war everywhere and must keep fighting til all the terrorists are defeated. But the problem is every time the USA drops bombs on innocent civilians the US creates even more enemies of America. Don't these people who are unjustly being bombed have a right to take up arms against those who have bombed and invaded their country . Obama has said that both the USA and Israel are permitted to defend themselves when attacked if that is so then don't other nations and peoples have the same rights.

"There's something wrong with this country" Martin Luther King JR. Here's a timely message to President Obama to stop the insane so-called Global War On Terror. Those who take a neutral stance get sent to the hottest part of Hell.




President Obama gets a free pass on actions Bush would have been attacked by the Mainstream Media while America's attacks in various countries and for his use of renditions, torture, targeted Assassinations

US drone strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Mali


"The United States is (still) the greatest purveyor of violence in the world." MLK

Here's a sentiment and observation about President Obama that Obama does not represent the ideals of Martin Luther King, JR. If he did Obama would have ended The Global War On Terror when in fact he has broadened this war to Yemen, Libya, Syria, Mali, Somalia etc. Meanwhile as Martin Luther king noted some 40 years ago that while billions and even trillions of dollars are wasted on these useless wars the country itself is claiming to be broke or near broke and that various social programs must be trimmed or even ended in order to continue pumping money into these conflicts.

Obama's MLK Problem

Uploaded on 25 Aug 2011



In America's dirty war President Obama is still using the notorious Blackwater mercenary firm that it's owner Prince an evangelical Christian promulgates the idea that this current Global War on Terrorism is a religious war in which it is a fight to the death between Christianity and Islam.

Prince's mercenaries working on behalf of the US government wantonly kills/murders civilians in the various countries it operates in without any oversight and knowing they have full immunity guaranteed to them by the White House and the US government.

Jeremy Scahill - President Obama continues to pay Blackwater

Uploaded on 25 Aug 2011

Jeremy Scahill discusses Blackwater on Kieth Olbermann's countdown.



Jeremy Scahill Reports on Obama continuing a number of Bush Regime policies July 11 2011

Uploaded & Jan. 21, 2013 by gordspoetryfactory edit.
— Jeremy Scahill, The Nation: "We should say first of all President Obama campaigned on a promise to go up against these Bush-era policies declaring war on the world, running secret sites, torturing prisoners. What I found in my nine days in Mogadishu, is the CIA is deeply involved in an underground dungeon that is officially run by the Somali National Security Agency, but their salaries are paid by the CIA directly. In fact, one Somali agent described how the Somalis are lined up and paid $200 a month in cash by U.S. agents, and the U.S. is interrogating prisoners, including those rendered by the Kenyan government, snatched off the streets of Nairobi based on U.S. intelligence and taken to this secret prison and interrogated. It certainly goes against the president's executive orders he signed in January 2009 and against then-CIA director Leon Panetta's statement to CIA personnel the U.S. had shut down all of these secret sites."




Rachel maddow laments Obama's decision not to prosecute those who committed torture but doesn't bother to mention the torture techniques still being used by the CIA and US military during Obama's time as Commander in Chief. Nor does she mention Obama's war crimes and his crimes against humanity committed in various countries.

Rachel Maddow Explains How President Obama Made The Use Of Torture Legal

Published on 8 Sep 2012

September 07, 2012 MSNBC News
http://MOXNews.com



and so it goes,
GORD.

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Will Obama's Second Term Be As Disastrous As The First As He Expanded The Global War On Terror and Still Uses Torture (Lite?)


So in a few hours President Obama will have his public and formal inauguration for his second term. The Hope is still that he commit himself to more progressive policies but we think that is a long shop the odds are in favor of those whom he now identifies with the Wall Street thugs and Banksters and Big Business and the Arms and intelligence industry sometimes referred to as Eisenhower did as The Military Industrial Complex.

So just because President Obama throws progressives and liberals a few bones doesn't mean that one should bury your head in the sand and stop criticizing Obama when he fails to live up to the promises he has made over the past five or six years.

Yes he may pass some decent enforceable gun control laws and give a nod to Don't Ask Don't Tell or Gay Marriage but what other positive things has Obama done.

Obama continues what is now the unpopular War on Drugs, He did nothing to help the millions of Americans who's homes were foreclosed, he has continued the egregious spying on US citizens , while putting Indefinite Detention into law along with Targeted Assassinations and renditions and the use of Interrogation Techniques which are considered (whether Obama thinks so or not)by International Law to be torture or tantamount to torture ie sleep deprivation,sensory deprivation, sensory overload , extended solitary confinement , verbal and physical abuse (Bradley Manning and hundreds of others esp in some legal limbo world ie Iraq, Afghanistan, Gitmo, Abu Ghraib or held in top secret facilities around the globe.)

Obama has done nothing to reduce the exponentially growing prison population which is disproportionately mad up of visible minorities Blacks and Latinos and is just another form of servitude for African Americans and on and on it goes.

So far Obama is a big disappointment. But maybe we can hop for a change of heart since he need not go out and raise money for his next campaign since this is his last as president which ends in January 2017.

Monday is also celebrated as Martin Luther King Day but Obama is far from being the one to carry the handed on torch of the King legacy. Obama is not on the side of the poor or minorities or on the side of freedom of assembly or freedom of speech and seems in fact to be dismissive of both when they are carried out by average American citizens ie The Occupy Movement which he allowed or encouraged the FBI, Homeland Security , CIA , and local police forces to crush with a vengeance etc.

Why if this is not true didn't Obama ever make a statement defending the hundreds of thousands of protesters taking part in the Occupy Movement.

Obama surely new that these federal departments were infiltrating and spying on members of this movement and that the FBI and Homeland Security were passing on baseless intel for instance alerting local police that the Occupy Movement was an extremist unAmerican organization and its motives including massive destruction of property and even a coordinated attack in various cities and towns to kill police officers. We now know that this propaganda war of disinformation came not from local police but higher up but did this include the White House we may never know.

We know from Obama's reliance on Drone attacks that like the Pentagon he has no regard for innocent civilians killed in these attacks.

Obama has over the past four years gone after Whistleblowers and protesters with a vengeance.

Obama is still spying on millions of Americans via warrantless wiretaps and accessing messages and communication on the internet as Bush did before him.

And as for American dissidents Aaron Swartz who committed suicide recently who had been hounded by federal prosecutors possibly under the direction of the Department of Justice and possibly the White House Irtself is one of the more recent victims of Obama's war on internet freedom and on whistleblowers ie Bradley Manning, Assange & wikileaks.

Obama has given the green light on assassinations and kidnappings (renditions) in other sovereign nations which contravene international law .

Obama has also given the green light to the abuse and torture of prisoners of war referred to dismissively as detainees.

Merely giving a dubious legal veneer for the use of Drone strikes and the use of other weapons such as Cluster Bombs and White Phosphorus and other incendiary weapons .

Obama is merely doing what Bush did and giving himself legal cover but given the disproportionate destruction and killing of civilians is a reason for doubting the US is using these weapons somewhat cavalierly in considering the deaths of innocent citizens does not factor into the carrying out of these so-called targeted killings.

As for the belief that the USA is still under attack by Al Qaeda, the Taliban or others is a bit of a stretch. What Obama and his legal staff contend is that any attack on US troops or civilians stationed in Afghanistan or elewhere is a further act of war even though the USA illegally and more importantly invaded Iraq bases on false deliberately fabricated evidence and therefore under the rules of war or even of "a just war" all actions resulting from that initial illegal act are themselves more crimes to be added to the initial crime of an unwarranted war of aggression against a country which was not an imminent threat to the USA or American allies.


Obama has had an Abysmal record on wantonly killing civilians just to make him look tough on terrorism.

Few terrorists are actually killed by these brutal Drone attacks.

The bombs they drop are either massive in size or are the banned Cluster bombs which are meant not for a precision attack but for the maximization of destruction and killing and maiming.

The 'Obama Doctrine' argues that any male 15 years of age or older killed in a Drone attack even absent any evidence is to be counted as an enemy combatant or terrorist. This way Obama can show that the killings and destruction were not disproportionate to the military objective.

It is just like going into a village for example killing everyone because you have intel saying the Taliban or other enemy of the USA is operating out of that village.
If we strictly apply the "Obama Doctrine" the US troops would enter the village round up all the men and boys 15 years or older and then execute them on the spot which there is lots of evidence to suggest that US troops are committing such atrocities. So we get repeats of Vietnam's Mi Li massacre and USA's scorched earth policy.


Obama also insists the number of civilians killed in Drone attacks not be reported accurately. And if no terrorists or enemy combatants are killed this is ignored or characterized by a military /technical error so those killed can go to their graves knowing they were not the ones being targeted but this can never be the case given the counting method of the Obama doctrine.

Obama as we now have come to understand uses similar bogus legal arguments to defend what he has ordered. Claiming the entire Globe as the Theater of War any attack on any US soldier or personnel can be construed as an act of war.

But as Obama's lawyers argue that each nation has the right to self-defense when unjustly attacked this creates a slight problem since the people of Iraq believed that the US attacked. conquered and occupied Iraq without just cause. And all acts committed by US troops and its allies are merely more war crimes to be added to the crime of "A War Of Aggression" , this can also be applied to Afghanistan, Pakistan , Libya etc. If American troops were not occupying through force the various nations they would not be in harm's way. America desire to rule the world has blinded it to its international obligations to uphold International Law not just in the letter of the law but also in the spirit of the law.

Like George W. Bush Obama as a legal expert sees the law as something to be manipulated to serve his and America's immoral agenda of spreading chaos and destroying peaceful movements for basic reforms in sovereign nations.

In Syria the Obama administration would prefer to have America's friend Bashir Assad retake control of the nation but if not the US does not want the pro-democratic elements to oust Assad and put in place a more just leader and governm,ent though less friendly to the USA government.


80% of drone strike victims innocent civilians

Published on 18 Oct 2012 RT

The majority of people killed by U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan are not militants, according to the country's Interior Minister. Rehman Malik said 80 per cent of more than two thousand people who have died as a result of strikes were civilians. RT talks to Ahmed Quraishi from PakNationalists Forum, Pakistan's first political lobbying group.



US assassination drone strikes kill 64 in Yemen in 3 days
USA also backed the one party Faux elections in Yemen
Published on 12 Mar 2012

US assassination drone strikes have killed at least 64 people in southern Yemen during attacks in the past three days on the provinces of Abyan and Bayda.



John Yoo's Doppleganger working as Obama's legal adviser Koh given his argument s whatever the USA does militarily or how it treats POWs or its massive destruction of infrastructure, schools, government offices, hospitals, roads buildings occupied by NGOs and journalists and other humanitarian workers or on ambulances and other emergency vehicles or to attacking those first responders who go to where there has just been attacked.




John Yoo's lies and fabrications and the abuse of legal language and rhetoric to say that in essence whatever the president does is by definition legal. This is the argument Nixon clung to as did those like Ollie North in the Iran/Contra scandal.

Now the question is if Obamaand his pet lawyers are just signing off on whatever he wants.

"We all practiced law here" says Conyers

Hearing on Torture with Addington & Yoo: Conyers' Questions

Uploaded on 26 Jun 2008

The Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties holds a hearing, "From the Department of Justice to Guantanamo Bay: Administration Lawyers and Administration Interrogation Rules, Part III." Witnesses will include David Addington, Chief of Staff to the Vice President; John Yoo, the former Justice Department lawyer who wrote a now-repudiated memo allowing the harsh interrogations; and Christopher Schroeder, Charles S. Murphy Professor of Law and Public Policy Studies at Duke University. Chairman John Conyers questions the witnesses.




By the way this testimony should have led to further investigation and the trial and possible internment of these lawyers and other working directly with the White House and those in the CIA and the Military who are guilty by following the these illegal and questionable and unreasonable orders from the White House .

This now has become Obama's crime after the fact and the defendant of these possible war criminals. Obama did this not as he claims to save the country from creating more turmoil but really he just wanted to first be accepted by all of those departments such as the CIA, FBI, Special Forces, Black Ops, Paid Mercenaries ie Blackwater and The Military chain of command. It is easier for all concerned in Obama and the view of most Americans now to bury these war crimes and crimes against humanity while Obama adds his own war crimes and crimes against humanity.

President Obama still following American foreign policy playbook by propping up dictators and authoritarian regimes in the Middle East such as Saudi Arabia , Bahrain even though these governments are anti-democratic reform and treat all dissidents and critics as if they were the enemy. And Obama appears to agree to the brutal cack down on protest in Bahrain , Saudi Arabia while criticizing similar crackdowns on protesters in Iran.

Glenn Greenwald argues the US is not in favor of the pro-democracy, pro-reform protests which were referred to as the Arab Spring. Unfortunately Obama is more interested in increasing US presence and hegemony in the Middle East, Central Asia and Africa in the further expansion of the American Empire.


Brookings' Bruce Riedel Urges Intensified US Support For Saudi Despots By Glenn Greenwald OPEDnews. Jan. 19,2013


...When they speak publicly, the mavens of the Foreign Policy Community -- whose primary function is to justify US militarism and aggression -- typically disguise their real beliefs and objectives with specialized obfuscating jargon. But every now and then, they have an outburst of uncharacteristic candor that clarifies their actual worldview. Such is the case with a remarkably clear memorandum to President Obama that Riedel(Bruce Riedel. A 30-year CIA officer and adviser to the last four US presidents, he is now a senior fellow at the wing of the Brookings Institution ) just authored and Brookings published regarding the extremely close US alliance with the regime in Saudi Arabia.

Riedel begins by noting that "Saudi Arabia is the world's last absolute monarchy" and "like Louis XIV, King Abdallah has complete authority." Moreover, "the Saudi royal family has shown no interest in sharing power or in an elected legislature." The Saudi regime not only imposes total repression on its own people but is also vital, he argues, in maintaining tyranny in multiple neighboring states: "they have helped ensure that revolution has not unseated any Arab monarch" and "the other monarchs of Arabia would inevitably be in jeopardy if revolution comes to Saudi Arabia." Specifically:

"The Sunni minority in Bahrain could not last without Saudi money and tanks. Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates are city-states that would be unable to defend themselves against a Saudi revolutionary regime, despite all their money."



...Indeed, the Obama administration has continuously lavished the Saudi Kingdom with a record amount of arms and other weapons, and has done the same for the Bahraini tyranny. He has done all this while maintaining close-as-ever alliances with the Gulf State despots as they crush their own democratic movements.

As always, the rationale for this steadfast US support for Arab tyranny is dubious at best. Riedel notes that "while the United States can live without Saudi oil, China, India, Japan and Europe cannot" -- but it's absurd to think that whoever rules Saudi Arabia would refuse to sell its oil on the world market. Riedel also argues that "the CIA war against al-Qaida is heavily dependent on the Kingdom" -- that gets closer to the truth, but it just shows how this endless "war" is the author of most of America's bad acts in the region, and it's ironic indeed that the only government with valid links to the 9/11 perpetrators has become the closest US ally in the "war on terror," while governments with no such links -- starting with Iran -- have become perpetual US enemies.


... the point here is not to object to US support for the world's worst dictators; it is, instead, to urge that this reality be acknowledged. Despite this obvious truth -- that the US has no objection whatsoever to tyranny but rather loves and supports it when tyrants are faithful to its interests -- hordes of foreign policy "experts" shamelessly pretend that the US and its NATO allies are committed to spreading freedom and democracy and fighting despotism in order to justify every new US and NATO intervention.

Just listen to the patently deceitful rhetoric that spews forth from US political leaders and their servants in the Foreign Policy Community when it comes time to rail against anti-US regimes in Libya, Syria and Iran. That the US and its NATO allies -- eager benefactors of the world's worst tyrants -- are opposed to those regimes out of concern for democracy and human rights is a pretense, a conceit, so glaring and obvious that it really defies belief that people are willing to advocate it in public with a straight face. Even Riedel notes the real reason for those interventions: the Saudis, he writes, are "pragmatists and have backed revolutions in Libya and Syria that undermine longstanding enemies of the Kingdom, especially Iran."


...Critically, this propaganda about the commitment to human rights and democracy of the US and its NATO allies is aimed at, and only works on, the domestic populations of those countries. People in the region where these pro-tyranny policies are imposed by Nato members are fully aware of this reality, as public opinion polls unambiguously prove. But when there exists a massive apparatus of self-proclaimed experts calling itself the Foreign Policy Community that exists to propagate these myths, and a US media that similarly views the world through the prism of the US government, it is easy to see why these myths, despite how patently absurd they are, work so effectively.
-------
And so it goes,
GORD.

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Obama's Takes Up The Cause of Gun Control while The Pro-Gun Lobby Regards The Right To Bear Arms As God's 11th Commandment & NRA In New Ad Goes After Obama's Family

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.) Isaiah 2:4
And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.


President Obama announces his plans for better gun control and notes that since the Sandyhook Massacre a month ago another 900 American citizens have died due to gun violence. Meanwhile the NRA and pro-gun and anti-Obama crowd are dismissive of those 900 who were killed claiming they are merely collateral damage as an unintended consequence of keeping faith with the 2nd Amendment which they as we have siad before they treat as God's eleventh Commandment as handed down to Moses. ie thou shalt carry assault weapons wherever thou goeth or what have you.

President Obama Announces Gun Control Proposals Jan.16, 2013



and via Demand A Plan :A Campaign of mayors Against Illegal Guns
Obama Jan 16, 2013.
900 more American citizens have been the victims of gun violence in America





Since the Sandyhook elimentary school massacre even many gun enthusiasts have stepped up to the plate saying enough is enough and that the USA needs improved and enforceable laws restricting the purchasing and the owning of fire arms.

But as we noted Jon Stewart pointed out on his program that there are in fact sensible laws on the books regarding gun control but over the last two decades the NRA and other pro-gun groups and individuals have made these laws unenforceable and have rendered the gun regulatory government department The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms utterly toothless. So who's running the show it seems to be the NRA and the Arms Industry and their merchants of death.


NRA ad goes way over the top and seems almost a veiled threat to President Obama and his family.
Color of Change.org has put up a petition to ban the airing of the NRA's outrageous pro-gun ad which appears to be a threat or ultimatum that Obama agree to NRA's demands or do without the protection of the Secret Service for him and his family.

Stop the NRA's attacks on the First Family

The National Rifle Association (NRA) is pushing an outrageous new 30-second ad branding President Obama an "elitist hypocrite" for expressing skepticism over its proposal to put a gun in every school — and dragging the president's children into the gun violence debate. Please join us to demand that television executives refuse to air this indefensible attack ad.



Here's the contents of the petition which can be viewed and signed at Color of Change website.

Dear network executives:

I urge you to refuse to air the new ad released by the National Rifle Association (NRA), which uses the national debate over gun violence to launch a dangerous personal attack on President Obama and his family.

The ad references President Obama's public statement that he's "skeptical" about the NRA claim that putting armed officers or guards in every American school will actually protect our kids from gun violence. But then the ad goes on to drag the president's children into the debate — suggesting that Sasha and Malia shouldn't be afforded a Secret Service detail unless Mr. Obama gets on board with the NRA's ill-conceived agenda.

This is a troubling new low that should raise serious concerns among you, your company, and your colleagues. Presidential families — and particularly the president's children — have historically been considered off limits for political attacks.

By refusing to air this inexcusable ad, your network can signal that it will not be party to an effort to whip up anger and paranoia targeting the President at the expense of meaningful public discourse on gun violence.
And now an example of NRA pro-gun anti-Obama anti-gun control pornography .
Morning Joe Panelist Calls NRA Ad On First Daughters 'Pornography'

Published on 16 Jan 2013

The National Rifle Association continued its headlong rush into political radioactivity by putting out an incredibly stupid, offensive ad in which they slam President Obama for sending his kids to a school with armed police officers, while expressing skepticism about the NRA's plan to require armed security in every school. On Wednesday morning's Morning Joe, panelist Mike Barnicle went so far as to call the ad "pornography," while co-host Mika Brzezinski called the NRA leadership "sick in the head."



Republican Tim Donnelly argues that God is in favor of Christians being armed and ready to defend themselves or others.

This ignores Jesus' teachings that violence is never a solution and he advocates 'turning the other cheek' and to not hate one's enemies but in fact to follow the more difficult path of 'loving one's enemies' .

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.) Mathew 25:40.
And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.

and: King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)  Mathew 5:39
But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.) Mathew  5: 44

But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.) Luke 6:35.
But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing again; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the Highest: for he is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil.
King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.) Leviticus 19:18.
Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the LORD.

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.) Micah 4:3
And he shall judge among many people, and rebuke strong nations afar off; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up a sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.

Republican: "Guns Are All a Part of God's Plan!"

Published on 18 Jan 2013

Republican lawmaker Tim Donnelly went on a Christian radio program to explain why he disagrees with President Obama's gun violence proposals. Why, you ask? Donnelly says that guns are an all a part of God's plan...

This clip from the Majority Report, live M-F at 12 noon EST and via daily podcast at http://Majority.FM



And more from Majority Report:

Crazy Right Wing Pastor's Insane Rant on Newtown School Shooting

Published on 16 Jan 2013

We thought we'd put this one up on YouTube. A few weeks ago, we discovered the wonderful pastor of "Old Paths Baptist Church" in Tennessee, Sam Morris. He had a lot to say about the Newtown school shooting, like it happened because of evolution and homosexuals...

This clip from the Majority Report, live M-F at 12 noon EST and via daily podcast at http://Majority.FM




So besides advocating against violence Jesus would not defend the so-called Global War on Terror' that is if one is to take the teachings of the Nazarene to heart and not merely pay lip service to his teachings. Very few Christians in fact adhere to Jesus teachings on this issue or many others including protecting the powerless and the poor and the sick , the disabled from those with power. To paraphrase Jesus 'What you do to the least of these you do unto me".

Tim Donnelly while advocating that the right to bear arms is sacrosanct he himself ignores laws requiring gun licenses and permits and has ignored regulations that make it illegal to carry a gun onto a plane.

Tim Donnelly, Republican Legislator, Says Guns Are 'Essential To Living The Way God Intended' By Cavan Sieczkowski, Huffington Post,Jan. 18, 2013


A California Republican legislator, who is a vocal opponent of President Barack Obama's gun control proposal, believes that guns are "essential to living the way God intended."

Assemblyman Tim Donnelly called in to the AM740 KBRITE Christian radio show, "The Bottom Line," to discuss gun control on Wednesday, when he revealed that he believes firearms are part of God's plan.

“Guns are used an average of 3 million times a year according to the Clinton Justice Department,” Donnelly said via RawStory. “That’s like 6,900 times a day. That’s the high end of the statistics. Other people say it’s only 200 times a day. Whatever that number is, they are used to defend human life. They are used to defend our property and our families and our faith and our freedom, and they are absolutely essential to living the way God intended for us to live.”

Annie-Rose Strasser of ThinkProgress notes that Donnelly's "God and guns" argument can be disputed by Bible verses pointing to the notion that "life should focus on family, not firearms."

Isaiah 2:4, for example, reads thus: “He shall judge between the nations, and shall decide disputes for many peoples; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore."

Many religious people have mobilized against guns recently. On Jan. 15, a group of 45 clergy and heads of religious organizations headed to Capitol Hill to petition lawmakers to reinstitute a ban on assault weapons, require background checks and make illegal weapons trafficking a federal crime.

(and what is disturbing about Donnelly is that he is no true believer in the rule of law and ignores laws which he finds inconvenient.)

...As for Donnelly, he does not only advocate for guns, but he has also been know to carry them. Illegally.

Last January, he was detained by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) for trying to bring a loaded Colt .45 handgun with four rounds onto a flight, the Associated Press reported. The gun was discovered in the Christian legislator's carry-on bag as he went through screening at Ontario International Airport. A magazine with five additional rounds was also found.

Donnelly didn't have a permit to carry a concealed weapon, permission he should have obtained from the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, according to the AP. He claimed he had the gun with him because of death threats he had previously received.

and so it goes,
GORD.

Friday, January 18, 2013

USA Steubenville Rape Coverup Just As Bad As Rape In India -Hacker Group Anonymous Leaks Chilling Video Of Steubenville Rape Case


What we are often told is that boys will be boys and especially Jocks.Local hero jocks are somehow given a free pass when they commit crimes.
But embedded in our culture and the US culture is the notion that most or all reports by women of rape are false .

The Mainstream Media in America and the West in general have voiced their disapproval and justifiably so of how the authorities in India have responded to gang rapes. The embedded assumption is that somehow India and its authorities are backward and sexist and misogynist or that the people of India have a different view about rape and about the rights of women.

The assumption then is that we in the supposedly more civilized West ie America are superior because we believe in justice and we are supposedly diligent in our application of justice and that no one is above the law. This unfortunately is nonsense . There are many average citizens and those in authority who do not take sexual assault or rape seriously.

Even now when women report being sexually assaulted they get treated as if they were victimizing the boys or men involved . The rape victim is questioned about her sex life, what clothes she wears, does she drink alcohol or go to wild parties was she teasing the alleged rapist(s). So everything about the victim is up for questioning and raising doubts about her accusations and her motives for reporting such an incident.

So you tell me are we really that much better than the authorities and citizens of India in our collective attitudes towards women and sexual assault.

But this gang rape case in Steubenville only became public because of video activists associated with Anonymous activists.

The Young Turks discuss the Steubenville rape case

Anonymous Outs Steubenville Rape Crews Disgusting Brags (VIDEO).


Democracy Now Steubenville




"Alleged" Rape-Cover up Protest #occupysteubenville #oprollredroll Steubenville 12.29

Published on 30 Dec 2012
Please visit localleaks.blogs.ru
Check out my latest video related to the case.
Petition here:1.usa.gov/VAfKIh
Twitter Hashtag: #oprollredroll #occupysteubenville #knightsec



And here's a great commentary we found at Youtube on how our culture in Canada and America has normalized rape and thereby creating our rape culture

Steubenville Football & Rape Culture

Published on 7 Jan 2013

When at least two football players from Steubenville, OH were found to have raped a teenage girl last August, the team's coaches vehemently denied their players had done anything wrong, blaming the victim. Is it possible that these boys didn't question what they were doing because of the attitudes of their role models in school and society as a whole? Furthermore, can pre-emptively teaching them not to be creepy also teach them not to commit rape?

For John Scalzi's Guide to Not Creeping, see: http://whatever.scalzi.com/2012/08/09/an-incomplete-guide-to-not-creeping/




Hacktivists take charge in high school rape case

Published on 5 Jan 2013

http://www.youtube.com/SupperNewsChannel
Hacktivists with an Anonymous cell called 'Knight Sec' have recently uncovered a video of high schoolers mocking a 16-year-old girl that was raped at a party in Steubenville, Ohio last summer by members of a local sports team. The video of one of the witnesses making light of the situation has been handed over to the website LocalLeaks and has since gone viral. Knight Sec and Anonymous say they are exposing corruption and a lack of accountability in the small town, and for once the media isn't shying away. Is this just the beginning of what hacktivists have in store for the new year? RT's Andrew Blake gives us his take on what to expect from them in 2013.




Thursday, January 17, 2013

Jon Stewart : NRA is a Michael Moore-run conspiracy to discredit gun owners & Rachel Maddow On Conservative Trolls And Aaron Swartz's Death Suicide or Murder Some Ask???


Aaron Swartz's death a result of the US government's and prosecutorial zeal to convict and a broken justice system in the USA.
               In recent years, as the Wall Street Journal has documented in a disturbing series of articles, Congress has enabled prosecutorial intimidation by criminalizing ever more conduct, passing laws that provide for or require extreme sentences, and reducing the burden of proof (through expanded application of "strict liability", where lack of criminal intent is no defense).
...As a foreigner, I'm surprised that Americans aren't more alarmed by the workings of their criminal justice system. I don't know what ought to scare me more about living in the United States--that I might be the victim of a crime (which happens), or that this ferocious prosecutorial system might one day turn its wrath on me. I'd rather be mugged than threatened with years in jail for something I didn't even know was a crime. Is this justice system actually on my side? I'm by no means sure--an astounding state of affairs.

At a conference I attended recently, I vented my preoccupation with rogue prosecutors, an ever-proliferating criminal law and the vanishing rights of the accused on a fellow attendee--a lawyer and former prosecutor. When I'd said my piece she said, "But you have to remember that nearly all of the people who are prosecuted are guilty." For half a second I thought she was joking and I started to laugh. But she wasn't joking.
Quote from Clive Crook The Death of Aaron Swartz By Clive Crook at The Atlantic, Jan. 15, 2013

and some are raising questions about Aaron Swartz's death was it suicide or murder  for some they believe that it was unlikely a matter of suicide given how passionate he was about his cause that is to keep the internet as free as possible to permit the flow of information which no one should be permitted to control and censor unnecessarily. -

       
He (Aaron Swartz)advocated online openness and freedom. He called information "power." He wanted it in the public domain. He wanted everyone able to share it freely and openly. Failure is "too high a price to pay," he said.
It's "outrageous and unacceptable," he added. Possessors of information are obligated to share it. They're morally bound not to "keep this privilege for (them)selves."
"(S)haring isn't immoral - it's a moral imperative. Only those blinded by greed would refuse to let a friend make a copy."
"Large corporations….are blinded by greed." Politicians are "bought off to back them." Legislation follows. It's immoral and unjust.
"There is no justice in following unjust laws. It’s time to come into the light and, in the grand tradition of civil disobedience, declare our opposition to this private theft of public culture."
Aaron advocated open access. He wanted information everyone has the right to know made public. Download them from scientific journals, he urged. Upload them to file sharing networks.
Make privatization of knowledge a thing of the past. He asked everyone to join him in a struggle for what's right. He did it because it matters.
He paid with his life. New York's medical examiner allegedly conducted an autopsy. He pronounced death by "hang(ing) himself in his Brooklyn apartment." 

Quote from article by Stephen Lendman : Aaron Swartz: Suicide or Murder? by Stephen Lendman, SteveLendmanBlog, Jan. 17, 2013
To avoid the specter of a conspiracy to murder it would seem that as during the dark days of the bully and self-promoting and aggrandizing Sen. Joseph McCarthy some of his targeted victims in fact did commit suicide after being persecuted by him. 

Cartoon poking fun at NRA and other anti-gun control advocates who argue if all American citizens were armed there would be far fewer mass murders or murders in America.

Maddow Takes On The Conservative Trolls who say outrageous things in order to be noticed.




Today's Menu;
Obama 's commitment to tighter gun control -mere rhetoric or in fact action?
Jon Stewart criticizes the NRA and the US government for making it impossible to enforce gun control laws in the USA.
Rachel Maddow's attack on Conservative Trolls and  Trolling as merely a way to say outrageous things to get attentio,
And more on the Obama Administration 's persecution of Aaron Swartz which led to his suicide.
Obama is not a champion of internet freedom but instead wants to drastically curb and undermine internet freedom. Obama appears to believe that he and the US government and the rich and powerful he supports ultimately have the right to restrict the free flow of information on the internet. 

Jon Stewart: NRA is a Michael Moore-run conspiracy to discredit gun owners by Eric W.Dolan ,The Raw Story, Jan. 17,2013

The Daily Show host Jon Stewart ruthlessly mocked the National Rifle Association on Wednesday night over their latest controversial advertisement.

The NRA’s new commercial called Obama an “elitist hypocrite” because the Secret Service protects his daughters, yet the President is skeptical that having armed guards in schools was the only answer to gun violence.

“And why does he get to veto bills and command an army, when we don’t?” Stewart joked. “If I didn’t know any better, and I’m not a big conspiracy guy, after seeing that ad, I would think the NRA was either an elaborate avant-garde Joaquin Phoenix-style joke, or a false flag operation run by Michael Moore in an attempt to discredit responsible gun owners.”

...While gun rights advocates have said the real problem was that current gun laws were not enforced, Stewart pointed out that thanks to their opposition, the agency tasked with enforcing those laws has been in a state of disrepair.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has not had a director for six years. The agency was also tied down by “comical limits,” as Stewart described them, such as being prohibited from tracking illegal gun sales.



Maddow on new NRA ads: Trolling a key aspect of conservative media by Eric Dolan at The Raw Story ,Jan. 16, 2013


On her show Wednesday night, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow said the National Rifle Association was simply “trolling” with its latest ads, a tactic employed throughout the conservative sphere.

“Trolling is a key part of the conservative-entertainment/media business model,” she said. “These guys say stuff all the time that they do not intend to be persuasive. They’re not trying to explain something, or bring people along to their way of thinking, they’re just doing something to attract attention, and hopefully condemnation and outrage from the mainstream, and particularly from liberals. They want to offend you. They seek to offend you. That is the point.”

Maddow said that “trolling” was a “tried and true schtick” for conservatives. Not just for media figures, but for politicians as well. She described Rep. Steve King (R-IA) as a “permanent troll.”

The new ad released by the National Rifle Association was a prime example of trolling, according to Maddow. The controversial ad said that President Barack Obama was an “elitist hypocrite” for having the Secret Service guard his two daughters while being skeptical that placing armed guards in schools was the only answer to mass shootings.


Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Also see:

  NRA: Membership Has Grown by 250,000 in One Month A quarter of a million people have signed up for new NRA memberships ahead of the White House Task Force's findings By Lauren Fox, USNEWS.com, Jan.15, 2013

And  at Mediaite:

  Here Are The 23 Executive Actions Pres. Obama Just Signed To Curb Gun Violence by Meenal Vamburkar, Mediaite, January 16th, 2013 Here Are The 23 Executive Actions Pres. Obama Just Signed To Curb Gun Violence by Meenal Vamburkar, Mediaite, January 16th, 2013

Aaron Swartz 's suicide a direct result of on going persecution by federal prosecutors and the U.S. Federal government all the way up to the Whitehouse. And what was President Obama's role in the aggressive unnecessary persecution of Internet freedom champion Aaron Swartz .

As pointed out by Stephen Lendman that as a candidate in 2008 Obama himself claimed he would do all he could to defend internet freedom but as president he has gone out of his way to curb the freedom of the internet and go after those who actively pursue internet freedom.


Aaron Swartz: Suicide or Murder? by Stephen Lendman, SteveLendmanBlog, Jan. 17, 2013

...A previous article questioned the official suicide story. It quoted Aaron extensively in his own words. It asked if he sounded like someone planning suicide.
He advocated online openness and freedom. He called information "power." He wanted it in the public domain. He wanted everyone able to share it freely and openly. Failure is "too high a price to pay," he said.
It's "outrageous and unacceptable," he added. Possessors of information are obligated to share it. They're morally bound not to "keep this privilege for (them)selves."
"(S)haring isn't immoral - it's a moral imperative. Only those blinded by greed would refuse to let a friend make a copy."
"Large corporations….are blinded by greed." Politicians are "bought off to back them." Legislation follows. It's immoral and unjust.
"There is no justice in following unjust laws. It’s time to come into the light and, in the grand tradition of civil disobedience, declare our opposition to this private theft of public culture."
Aaron advocated open access. He wanted information everyone has the right to know made public. Download them from scientific journals, he urged. Upload them to file sharing networks.
Make privatization of knowledge a thing of the past. He asked everyone to join him in a struggle for what's right. He did it because it matters.
He paid with his life. New York's medical examiner allegedly conducted an autopsy. He pronounced death by "hang(ing) himself in his Brooklyn apartment." 
... Did Aaron take his own life or was he murdered? America has a dark history of eliminating noted figures it wants silenced.
Aaron perhaps is the latest. His death raises obvious suspicions. He appears a victim of capitalist greed. His open access advocacy had to be silenced. What better way than by making murder look like suicide.
Was he drugged and then hanged? Was eliminating him planned long ago? Was it done to avoid protracted headline-making trial proceedings?
Many of Aaron's global followers would have reported them daily. Doing so would have revealed prosecutorial injustice. Dark forces perhaps decided not to risk it.
Prosecutors hounded him. His attorney, Elliot Peters, accused them of doing it to gain publicity. They cooked up alleged computer crimes against him.
They targeted his advocacy for what's right. They wanted him silenced. They wanted him put away for decades. They wanted him out of sight and mind.
They crossed ethical and moral lines, said Lessig. They did what they did because they can. They made him a martyr in the process. He's internationally recognized for fighting for what's right.
Internet freedom is at stake. In 2008, candidate Obama promised to "(s)upport the principle of network neutrality to preserve the benefits of open competition on the Internet."
As president he's waged war to destroy it. He wants open access advocates criminalized. He calls doing so investing in America's future. He wants censorship replacing First Amendment rights.
He and likeminded Washington extremists support an alphabet soup of federal and international freedom-destroying measures.
Various cybersecurity acts threaten constitutional freedoms.SOPA, PIPA, CISPA, ACTA, and TPP are stealth pro-corporate, anti-populist schemes. Secrecy and misbranding conceal their harshness. Activists know what's going on and say so. At issue is unchallenged global corporate empowerment regulation free.
Internet freedom, popular rights, and national sovereignty are too important to lose. They're on the chopping block for elimination.
Profits alone matter. Compromising civil liberties is a small price to pay. So are public knowledge, privacy, and other fundamental rights free societies should champion. Democratic values are too important to lose.
Obama has other ideas in mind. Aaron and likeminded open access advocates challenged him. Doing so targeted him for elimination. Others are likewise threatened.
And Clive Crook at the Atlantic argues that the zealousness by Federal Prosecutors has become par for the course and may have been the major factor which led to Aaron Swartz's suicide.

 The Death of Aaron Swartz By Clive Crook at The Atlantic, Jan. 15, 2013
It's usually a mistake to leap to conclusions after a tragedy like the suicide of Aaron Swartz. I know nothing about the details of the case or his state of mind apart from what I've read in newspapers and online. But my unguarded reaction is that the story does seem an instance of reckless prosecutorial excess, and that the prosecutors bear some responsibility for his death. As Swartz's family said,
Aaron's death is not simply a personal tragedy. It is the product of a criminal justice system rife with intimidation and prosecutorial overreach. Decisions made by officials in the Massachusetts U.S. Attorney's office and at MIT contributed to his death. The US Attorney's office pursued an exceptionally harsh array of charges, carrying potentially over 30 years in prison, to punish an alleged crime that had no victims.
Let's put the worst possible construction on what Swartz did. In other words, don't claim that no crime was actually committed (which is at least arguable); don't call it a harmless prank (as one might be inclined to); forget that JSTOR wanted to take the matter no further once its files had been returned, and that Swartz wasn't acting for personal gain; ignore the issue that he was aiming to highlight -- the question whether it's right to keep scholarly work, undertaken partly at public expense, behind a paywall; never mind that JSTOR has now granted limited free access to its documents. Assume what Swartz did was simple, selfish, unmitigated theft, as the prosecutors appear to think. Even on that ethically brainless view, the charges and threatened penalties were so disproportionate as to be quite unhinged.
But here's the point: Under the present dispensation, they're actually rational. That's why Swartz's family is right to impugn the wider criminal-justice system.
By and large, American prosecutors no longer fight their cases at trial. The new dispensation is justice by plea bargain. The more savage the penalties prosecutors can threaten, the more likely the defendant (guilty or innocent) is to speed things along by pleading guilty and accepting a light penalty. According to the Wall Street Journal, Swartz was offered the choice of pleading guilty and going to jail for six to eight months, or else going to trial and taking his chances. The multiple counts and their absurdly savage sentences are best seen, just as the family said, as instruments of intimidation.
The prosecutor's bottom line, apparently, was that Swartz had to go to jail. In my conception of criminal justice, the prosecutor's role is to establish guilt, not pass sentence. Juries have already been substantially dispensed with in this country. (By substantially, I mean in 97 percent of cases.) If prosecutors are not only going to rule on guilt unilaterally but also, in effect, pass sentence as well, one wonders why we can't also dispense with judges.
In recent years, as the Wall Street Journal has documented in a disturbing series of articles, Congress has enabled prosecutorial intimidation by criminalizing ever more conduct, passing laws that provide for or require extreme sentences, and reducing the burden of proof (through expanded application of "strict liability", where lack of criminal intent is no defense).
And other articles on Aaron Swartz: Was there a conflict of interests on the part of the over-zealous federal prosecutor of Aaron Swartz since the prosecutor's husband is an executive at IBM . Isn't she too close to the very people who are against internet freedom .

   IBM Exec Husband of Aaron Swartz Prosecutor Takes to Twitter to Defend His Wife by Jessica Roy via Betabeat.com,Jan. 15, 2013

  Justice System "Overreach" Blamed in Suicide of Open-Access Technology Activist By Declan Butler and Nature News Blog Scientific American , jan. 15, 2013
 
"Aaron Swartz faced an imminent trial for having downloaded some four million articles from a not-for-profit scholarly archive, and a possible penalty of 35 years in prison and a $1-million fine, which some call disproportionate to his actions"

Aaron Swartz's Suicide Puts Internet Openness Fight In Spotlight by John Keilman and Sally Ho, Chicago Tribune via Business Insider,Jan. 15, 2013

 
and so it goes,
GORD.