ABDUL RAHMAN ON TRIAL FOR CONVERTING TO CHRISTIANITY IN NEW & IMPROVED AFGHANISTAN ??? & BUSH'S ROSY VIEW OF THE WAR ON TERROR & THE MEDIA MIA

ABDUL RAHMAN ON TRIAL IN AFGHANISTAN FOR CONVERTING TO ISLAM
Posted by Picasa

PRESIDENT BUSH PRAISES PRESIDENT HAMID KARZAI OF AFGHANISTAN FOR THE GOOD JOB HE IS DOING ???
Posted by Picasa

IRAQI WOMAN IN FRONT OF HOUSE DESTROYED BY U.S. FORCES AT THE VILLAGE OF ABU SIFA
Posted by Picasa

IRAQI MOURN DEATHS OF ELEVEN FAMILY MEMBERS ALLEGEDLY MURDERED BY U.S. FORCES IN THE VILLAGE OF ABU SIFA
Posted by Picasa




We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men: George Orwell

They could be made to accept the most flagrant violations of reality, because they never fully grasped the enormity of what was demanded of them, and were not sufficiently interested in public events to notice what was happening : George Orwell

Political language. . . is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind: George Orwell

The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them: George Orwell

ABOVE QUOTES COURTESY ICH
To read this newsletter online
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/

And here are two quotes I wish to add which are pertinent to the issue discussed below:

No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent.
John Donne

Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in Mankind; And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.
JOHN DONNE

Anyway I wish to begin by using a collection of recent news items relating to the US Administration’s War on Terror .



Bush hails Afghanistan on surprise visit
By Kim Sengupta in Lashkar Gar, Helmand
Published: 02 March 2006
The Independent on line


President George Bush has visited Afghanistan for the first time since the invasion by the US and Britain and said the country was on the road to success.

Mr Bush, speaking at a public appearance with the Afghan President, Hamid Karzai, said the US remained committed to the future of Afghanistan and praised the progress made following the overthrow of the Taliban regime.

In a press conference with Mr Karzai, Mr Bush told the Afghan people their democracy was taking hold: "You are inspiring others and the inspiration will cause others to demand their freedom."


Bush Asks U.S. to Look Past Iraq Bloodshed


Tuesday March 21, 2006 4:01 AM
By TOM RAUM
Associated Press Writer

CLEVELAND (AP) - Beginning the fourth year of an unpopular war, President Bush defended his Iraq record on Monday against skeptical questioning. He said he could ``understand people being disheartened'' but appealed to Americans to look beyond the bloodshed and see signs of progress.

Bush fielded questions for nearly an hour at the City Club, a forum known for its tough interrogations of world leaders. Not only was he grilled on Iraq, but he also was asked to justify his warrantless wiretapping program, U.S. relations with Pakistan and his domestic priorities.

Anyway in the not so rosy world of George Bush the situation isn’t quite the way Bush pretends it to be which brings us to the case of the Afghanistan citizen Abdul Rahman.

Afghan trial of Christian 'troubles' Bush

By Stephen Dinan
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
March 23, 2006

WHEELING, W. Va. -- President Bush yesterday said he was "deeply" troubled by the trial in Afghanistan of a Christian who could face execution for converting from Islam and vowed to pressure the Afghan government on the matter.
"It is deeply troubling that a country we helped liberate would hold a person to account because they chose a particular religion over another," Mr. Bush said.
Abdul Rahman could face the death penalty for rejecting Islam. He converted to Christianity 16 years ago while working for a Christian aid organization in Pakistan, but it just came to light recently during a custody battle over his two children.
While nations such as Italy and Germany lodged strong protests earlier this week against the trial, the U.S. State Department on Tuesday was more tepid, calling the case a matter for Afghan authorities.
Yesterday, Mr. Bush took a much firmer stance.
"We have got influence in Afghanistan, and we are going to use it to remind them that there are universal values," he said.
It appeared yesterday that Afghanistan was looking for a way out of the international furor over the matter. The Associated Press, reporting from Kabul, Afghanistan, quoted a prosecutor as saying Mr. Rahman may be mentally unfit for trial.


Anyway one of the top stories this week has been the trial in Afghanistan of Abdul Rahman who was a Muslim who became a Christian & this we are told is against the law in Afghanistan.
Abdul Rahman is being tried in Afghanistan not just for renouncing Islam & becoming a Christian but for then refusing to return to Islam. This means that the New Afghanistan government does not support Freedom of Religion. There are few who would believe that anyone should be arrested & tried for their religious beliefs. But under the extremist interpretation of Islamic law which is called Sharia any Muslim who converts to another faith & refuses to return to Islam can be tried & executed & it appears that the trial in this case is just a formality to appease moderate Muslims & possibly America & the rest of the West. It shows that either Islamic extremist or “ Fundamentalist ” do not quite grasp what democracy & a free pluralistic society entails or they regard it as unimportant .
This goes against the basic principles of a free society. In a free society people are free to join whatever religious group they wish. They also have the freedom to reject all religious beliefs. Individuals can in a free society believe whatever they wish they can be Christian, Buddhist, Hindu ,Pagan or Scientologist or even belong to the Flat Earth Society . This comes with certain caveats that they do not interfere with the beliefs or practices of others. This is to protect those who belong to various religious groups so that they will not be persecuted by those who are in power . All then are free from any form of religious tyranny whether that tyranny is by the majority or by a powerful minority .
It is strange how a religious minority which feels persecuted once they get into power they then choose to persecute those with different religious beliefs from their own .

It is somewhat bizarre though that this case of blatant injustice against an Afghan citizen should arise just after George Bush praised President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan & his government for being an example of a just & democratic government. Ousting the former Taliban Government doesn’t seem to have brought about the changes which Bush claims have taken place in that country. The people of Afghanistan are still being ruled by a tyrannical & oppressive regime that does not respect human rights & freedoms. The same allegations have also been made concerning the present government installed in Iraq . The people of Iraq who do not adhere to this strict extremist form of Sharia Law also complain that those with power nationally or locally are trying to enforce the same sort of repressive regulations on the general population.
It is also unfortunate for we Canadians since our troops are now playing a major role in propping up this rather unsavory American puppet regime.
As for the on-going abuses by government forces in Afghanistan a US government report released in March 2006 claims:

That “Kabul's treatment of prisoners has been harshly condemned.

"There continued to be instances in which security and factional forces committed extrajudicial killings and torture. Torture and abuse consisted of pulling out fingernails and toenails, burning with hot oil, sexual humiliation and sodomy," the U.S. State Department said in assessing its Afghan ally this month.
And :
The Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission found that "torture continues to take place as a routine part of police procedures." ’

And from SCRIPPS HOWARD NEWS SERVICE:
http://www.shns.com/

U.S. not fighting for right to execute converts

By MARSHA MERCER
Media General News Service
26-MAR-06

WASHINGTON -- The case of Abdul Rahman, on trial for his life in Afghanistan for the crime of converting to Christianity, couldn't have come at a worse time for President Bush.

The president went on the campaign trail last week, trying to convince people that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are worth the cost in American lives and dollars. The United States is fostering the "universal thought" of liberty, Bush insisted, and people everywhere are desperate for freedom.

But the headlines indicated that freedom is a surprisingly hard sell.

Four years into the war, Bush said that some future president will decide when to bring all the troops home from Iraq. American troops will be there at least until 2009.

The news from Kabul showed how little has changed in Afghanistan in the post-Taliban era. Afghanistan has a constitution, but Islamic law, known as Sharia, governs. And it prohibits converting from Islam on pain of death.

People may debate about whether the "good news" from Iraq is getting out, but everybody gets the Christian convert story.

Rahman, 41, converted to Christianity some 16 years ago while working in Germany and Pakistan. He returned to Afghanistan, where he got embroiled in a child custody battle with his ex-wife. His family, shamed by his conversion, turned him in. He openly declares he's a Christian. Now, he faces a trial and execution. ”

And now let’s see if we can sort all of this out so here goes...
It is interesting how much attention this case has been given by the Media in Europe & Canada & the United States. I wonder if the case would have received as much attention if it involved a Muslim who became a Hindu or Buddhist or some other religion other than Christianity.

It is also interesting that this case has over-shadowed recent allegations of American & British forces involved in human rights violations & war crimes in Iraq.
In one case we have a video of British troops viciously beating up several Iraqi youths-
In another case Americans are accused of murdering eleven members of a family including five children.

There is also the allegations in the case of several British soldiers who were arrested dressed as Iraqi civilians & were in the act of setting up a car bomb to explode in a market in Iraq- were they working for the British or just more rogue elements or a few more bad apples who do not represent the official army of occupation and besides how will we ever know- the Blair regime is no better at being truthful than the Bush regime.

It also bothers me that the Massacre of Muslims whether in Iraq over the last three years or the massacre of Muslims in Bosnia 1995 or the 2002 Gujarat massacre of Muslims in India are often down-played by our press & are often reported as an afterthought rather than headline news in the way that Abdul Rahman’s case has become. The Massacre in India & Bosnia were committed with the help or by the inaction of the governments in power & ignored or downplayed by the International Community.
I don’t mean to try to diminish the importance of his case . “ the death of one person diminishes me” But he is also a victim of the same sort of indifference to Human Rights & Freedom which seems to be growing rather than lessening as Bush & Blair & Harper claim. Since they claim the World is a better place after the Invasions of Afghanistan & Iraq & will be even better after they teach the Iranians a lesson in diplomacy & brute force. And they get away with all of this wrapping themselves in their respective flags & the superiority of Christianity & Western Values though they toss away such values whenever it suits their purpose . For example they go to great lengths justifying the use of “ Renditions” & Torture & imprisoning people without due process & obliterating an entire city like Fallujah etc.

Part of the problem is that some of us in the West actually believe in these so called Western Values which we believe ought to be universal values but those in power merely pay lip service to such values. In the end those in power such as the Neo-Cons & their backers the Religious Right only believe in maintaining & increasing their wealth & power & pushing forward their Ideology. And as I have said before both groups use each other to promote their own agendas.
The other point I would make is that the Political Christian Right or at least its leaders believe in a form of Protestant Fundamentalism has a lot in common with the Extremist Islamist of the Taliban & those who are now in power in Afghanistan & Iraq.
As for the Christian Religious Right they also like the Extremist Islamic groups wish to transform our society so that it adheres to their peculiar fundamentalist view of the Bible as the literal & inerrant word of God. They claim they wish to return to a traditional view of Christianity but it is not a traditional view at all but a radical innovative mean spirited view of Christianity the roots of which dates back only to about a century or so & does not date back to the first couple of centuries of the history of Christianity. Their God is a God of wrath & vengeance & not of Compassion or love except for the Chosen elect & they somehow are able to discern all of the thoughts of God & therefore know exactly what God desires of us & who are the chosen & who are the damned & the damned includes 90% of Humankind who one way or the other will pay for their grave sins.
The other odd thing about all of this is that when President George Bush a Born-Again Protestant Fundamentalist who when faced with a real that is open Press Conference seems a little out of touch with reality. He & those around him seem to believe; if we all just close our eyes & clap our hands or click our heels together & wish that everything is okay in Iraq or Afghanistan or wherever then everything will be okay. Like Peter Pan “ I do believe in Fairies; I do I do! ” Millions of Americans , British & Canadians seem quite willing to accept this form of “ Magical Thinking ”.
But maybe with the case of Abdul Rahman like the controversy over the administration’s Port Deal with the United Emirates this will lead to more people becoming aware that there is something gone terribly wrong in the War on Terror &the steady diet of Propaganda which we have been fed & the rosy picture Bush promotes does not represent the reality of the situation.

In regards to the case of Abdul Rahman we can contrast it with a real crime committed by American soldiers which has received almost no press-coverage since it did not agree with Bush’s rosy picture of the War on Terror .
The case involves a vicious premeditated murder of an imprisoned Iraqi General carried out by American soldiers one of whom was charged & tried but his sentencing given the enormity of the deed is laughable & people in the west wonder why Muslims & Arabs do not take all this talk about freedom & justice seriously so here is part of the piece presented by Robert Fisk:

The farcical end of the American dream
The US press is supposed to be challenging the lies of this war
By Robert Fisk


Mr Welshofer, it transpired in court, had stuffed the Iraqi General Abed Hamed Mowhoush head-first into a sleeping bag and sat on his chest, an action which - not surprisingly - caused the general to expire. The military jury ordered a reprimand for Mr Welshofer, the forfeiting of $6,000 of his salary and confinement to barracks for 60 days. Welshofer's wife's Barbara, , "testified that she was worried about providing for their three children if her husband was sentenced to prison. 'I love him more for fighting this,' she said, tears welling up in her eyes. 'He's always said that you need to do the right thing, and sometimes the right thing is the hardest thing to do'".

And as for the rights of POWS or Detainees when it comes to getting a fair trial here is a report from the Australian newspaper the Sydney Morning Herald taken from transcripts of hearings at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp recently released:

One of them records the trial of since-released British prisoner Feroz Abbasi, in which Mr Abbasi vainly pleads with his judge, a US air force colonel, to reveal the evidence against him, something he says he has a right to hear under international law.

the American colonel replied: "Mr Abbasi, your conduct is unacceptable and this is your absolute final warning. I do not care about international law. I do not want to hear the words international law. We are not concerned about international law." ’


It should be noted that not all Muslims believe that Abdul Rahman or anyone else should be punished for leaving Islam & converting to another religion. For example The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) March 22 in a press-release & open letter to the Afghanistan government & to President George Bush referring to Abdul Rahman states “ the man’s conversion is a personal matter not subject to the intervention of the state ”. The letter then goes on to argue that the Quran does not support treating converts from Islam to another religion as criminals as they argue:

“Islamic scholars say the original rulings on apostasy were similar to those for treasonous acts in legal systems worldwide and do not apply to an individual’s choice of religion. Islam advocates both freedom of religion and freedom of conscience, a position supported by verses in the Quran, Islam’s revealed text, such as:

1) ‘If it had been the will of your Lord that all the people of the world should be believers, all the people of the earth would have believed! Would you then compel mankind against their will to believe?’ (10:99)
2) ‘(O Prophet) proclaim: ‘This is the Truth from your Lord. Now let him who will, believe in it, and him who will, deny it.’’ (18:29)
3) ‘If they turn away from thee (O Muhammad) they should know that We have not sent you to be their keeper. Your only duty is to convey My message.’ (42:48)
4) ‘Let there be no compulsion in religion.’ (2:256)

“Religious decisions should be matters of personal choice, not a cause for state intervention. Faith imposed by force is not true belief, but coercion. Islam has no need to compel belief in its divine truth. As the Quran states: ‘Truth stands out clear from error. Therefore, whoever rejects evil and believes in God has grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold that never breaks.’ (2:256)

“We urge the government of Afghanistan to order the immediate release of Mr. Abdul Rahman.”

Before issuing its statement, CAIR consulted with members of the Fiqh Council of North America, an association of Islamic legal scholars that interprets Muslim religious law. ”

Check out CAIR website
http://www.cair-net.org/
( the site also contains press-releases which condemned the terrorist attacks of
9/11 )

Also check out : The American Muslim
http://theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php

Bbc.co.uk
Press Releases
God told me to invade Iraq, Bush tells Palestinian ministers
06.10.2005

AND then there is the Ides of March Massacre in Iraq for instance check out:
Julian Borger in Washington
Tuesday March 21, 2006
The Guardian

Iraqi police have accused American soldiers of executing 11 Iraqi civilians, including four children and a six-month-old baby, in a raid on Wednesday(March 15) near the city of Balad, it was reported yesterday.

In last year's Haditha incident, US troops are accused of killing civilians after a bomb attack. An initial marine report on the incident said a roadside bomb on November 19 last year killed a lance corporal and 15 Iraqi civilians. But further investigation revealed that the civilians had been shot with marine weapons after the blast.

and according to an investigative report about the incident done by TIME Magazine:
“A nine-year-old survivor, Eman Waleed, who lived in a house 150 metres from the roadside bomb attack told Time magazine that after the explosion her father began reading the Qur'an. "First, they went into my father's room, where he was reading the Qur'an, and we heard shots," she said. "I couldn't see their faces very well, only their guns sticking into the doorway. I watched them shoot my grandfather first in the chest and then in the head. Then they killed my granny."’

and further:

Empire Burlesque
US Raid on home killed 11 family members
By Amer Amery

03/16/06 - TIKRIT, Iraq, March 15 (Reuters) -

A senior Iraqi police officer said autopsies on the bodies, which included five children, showed each had been shot in the head. Community leaders said they were outraged at the killings and demanded an explanation from the U.S. military.

Also check out:

US Marines investigated for Iraq war crimes
By Jenny Booth and agencies
TIMESONLINE MARCH 17 /06
About a dozen US Marines are being investigated for possible war crimes after the deaths last year of 15 Iraqi civilians caught in the crossfire during a gun battle with insurgents.


And for more commentary on these alleged massacres & photos see:

Killing Women and Children: The “My Lai Phase” Of The Iraq War
By Mike Whitney
03/20/06 "ICH" -- --

March 15 was another defining moment in America’s downward moral-spiral in Iraq. Eleven members of an Iraqi family were killed in a wanton act of slaughter executed by American occupiers. Photos taken at the scene show the lifeless bodies of young children, barely old enough to walk, lying motionless in the back of a flatbed truck while their fathers moan inconsolably at their side.

AND:
US Marines investigated for Iraq war crimes
By Jenny Booth and agencies
TIMESONLINE MARCH 17 /06

Crying Wolf: Media Disinformation and Death Squads in Occupied Iraq
by Max Fuller
November 10, 2005
GlobalResearch.ca

The evidence was sufficiently compelling for the Association of Muslim Scholars (AMS), a leading Sunni organisation, to issue public statements in which they accused the security forces attached to the Ministry of the Interior as well as the Badr Brigade, the former armed wing of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI), of being behind the killings. They also accused the Ministry of the Interior of conducting state terrorism (Financial Times).

CIA death squads operating in Iraq
By Henry Michaels
8 April 2003
WORLD SOCIALIST WEB
http://www.wsws.org

also see William Blume
THE ANTI-EMPIRE REPORT
http://www.killinghope.org/



BBC NEWS
DEATH SQUADS CAUGHT IN THE ACT
THURSDAY FEB. 16, 2006
http://news.bbc.co.uk/

Coffins containing bodies of 11 men found shot dead in Baghdad on 1 February
Sunni Arab Iraqis have long complained about death squads
Iraq has launched an investigation into claims by the US military that an Iraqi interior ministry "death squad" has been targeting Sunni Arab Iraqis.

Anyway Bye for now
And AS EDWARD R. MURROW USED TO SAY
“ Good Night & GOOD LUCK ”
GORD.

INFORMATION CLEARING HOUSE, THE HUFFINGTON POST &THE THREAT OF AYN RAND & OBJECTIVISM

"NIGHT CAFE" BY VINCENT VAN GOGH
Posted by Picasa

Patriotism is a religion, the egg from which wars are hatched.": Guy de Maupassant

"Politically speaking, tribal nationalism [patriotism] always insists that its own people are surrounded by 'a world of enemies' - 'one against all' - and that a fundamental difference exists between this people and all others. It claims its people to be unique, individual, incompatible with all others, and denies theoretically the very possibility of a common mankind long before it is used to destroy the humanity of man." -Hannah Arendt, The Origins Of Totalitarianism p.227


"Seas of blood have been shed for the sake of patriotism. One would expect the harm and irrationality of patriotism to be self-evident to everyone. But the surprising fact is that cultured and learned [socially conditioned and indoctrinated] people not only do not notice the harm and stupidity of patriotism, they resist every unveiling of it with the greatest obstinacy and passion (with no rational grounds), and continue to praise it as beneficent and elevating." -Leo Tolstoy

"Blind patriotism has been kept intact by rewriting history to provide people with moral consolation and a psychological basis for denial." -William H. Boyer

The above quotes I have copied from a website which I find helpful on a daily basis. It is called The Information Clearing House & was created & run by Tom Feeley who is not connected with any political party or organization.
He describes the site as one of WORLD NEWS DAILY: NEWS YOU WON’T FIND ON CNN OR FOX NEWS & as An alternative independent non-commercial source for news, information and insight.
And further he says that:
This web site has grown out of my personal frustration and anger at the failure of traditional commercial media to inform the American public, especially as it relates to US foreign policy.
And here is the address:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/index.html

I subscribe to his free newsletter which daily contains several pertinent quotes by various historians , philosophers , academics , journalists & politicians from Plato to Noam Chomsky to Ghandi to Martin Luther King to Oscar Wilde etc. It also includes news articles about contemporary issues gleaned from the Internet , Newspapers, TV & radio etc.

Anyway I hope some of you will check it out as it is for the worthwhile cause of getting more of the truth out there. It is also convenient for those interested in the subjects presented who do not have hours each day to spend looking in vain for more in depth coverage of today's headlines.
And so I wish Tom Feeley the best of luck.

Another site which I want to direct readers to which is rather informative & has grown in leaps & bounds is THE HUFFINGTON POST founded by writer & journalist Arianna Huffington. There are always some provocative articles & posts written by a number of regular contributors which include journalists & academics.
The site also covers issues of science & religion & the daily grumblings & bumblings of the Bush administration as well as entertainment & sports news etc.
The site is at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
For instance one of the top stories on the site today is :JUST IN Associated Press | March 14, 2006

"Television evangelist Pat Robertson said Monday on his live news-and-talk program ''The 700 Club'' that Islam is not a religion of peace, and that radical Muslims are ''satanic.''

Robertson's comments came after he watched a news story on his Christian Broadcasting Network about Muslim protests in Europe over the cartoon drawings of the Prophet Muhammad. "

You see I can’t pass this one by without adding my two cents and so...
Anyway a news headline like this is due for some controversy since Pat doesn't just see the radical Islamic terrorist as bad guys but working hand in glove with SATAN himself & not just some lowly IMP or second rate Demon. As I have said it is this sort of on-going attack on Islam which just creates more pissed-off Muslims. But in his world of Religious Right Fanatics all of this is great stuff to bring on the end days & so bring us all closer to the day of Jesus's Second Coming & Heaven Help Us All from The Christian Religious Right & the Fanatical Taliban . To me they are cut from the same cloth but the question is who is praying to the right god or is neither of them on the road to salvation.

Anyway I mentioned the writer & wannabe philosopher Ayn Rand in my last post which was probably because I just recently read several of her books though they are rather dull & plodding & I have been reading articles on various websites dedicated to her philosophy which she called OBJECTIVISM. Even the word chills me to the bone. I had met many people over the years who treated Ayn Rand as if she were some kind of GURU or Prophet & I found much of her thinking to be unsound or impenetrable . The thing of it is that she believed in America & Capitalism & she believed all religion to be a lot of wishful thinking & nonsense so she spent years developing a philosophy to support her beliefs. She has a large following of people who seemed to have found a non-religious religion as it were that they could believe in totally .

so here is the rather large main website of her true believers:
THE AYN RAND INSTITUTE
www.aynrand.org/
Here is a sample of what this stuff is all about from the Institutes Introduction to the site:
Introduction
The Ayn Rand Institute (ARI), a 501(c)(3) educational organization, was established in 1985 and is headquartered in Irvine, California. ARI has a distinguished Board of Directors and a staff of about 30 employees.

Ayn Rand (1905-1982) was an ardent advocate of reason, rational self-interest, individual rights and free-market capitalism.

ARI seeks to promote these principles, spearheading a "cultural renaissance" that will reverse the anti-reason, anti-individualism, anti-freedom, anti-capitalist trends in today's culture. The major battleground in this fight for reason and capitalism is the educational institutions—high schools, and above all, the universities, where students learn the ideas that shape their lives.

Ayn Rand's philosophy—known as Objectivism—holds that historical trends are the inescapable product of philosophy. To reverse the current political and economic trends in America and throughout the world requires a reversal of our society's fundamental philosophy.

Victory in this war of ideas will ultimately mean the defeat of the widely held, pernicious ideologies that dominate contemporary culture and threaten our liberty—ideologies such as statism, multiculturalism, environmentalism, racism and mysticism.

AND AS THEY GLEEFULLY ADD THAT THEIR NUMBERS ARE GROWING - ( AT AN ALARMING RATE I MIGHT ADD)
The Ayn Rand Renaissance
Ayn Rand's visibility—and interest in her philosophy—have increased dramatically in recent years.

500,000 copies of Ayn Rand's books were sold last year alone—more than two decades after Rand's death. Total sales of Rand's fiction and nonfiction now exceed 23 million copies. ----

So here is a group which I believe to be as dangerous as the more radical members of the Christian Religious Right. Note unlike Ayn Rand I do not hold such a disdain for all religious beliefs since I take such beliefs as being just part of what makes us human for better or worse. This should raise a few eyebrows. On the other hand just because someone calls themselves an atheist or agnostic or humanist doesn't mean I think any less of their opinions. But Ayn Rand & her pontificating Neo-conservatives give me the creeps. One of the main things they hate is the whole idea of ALTRUISM which even Humanists usually think of as a good thing. Instead her motivation is profit & one's own selfishness & the desire for personal happiness & to Hell with everybody else.

For more on Ayn Rand I recommend two of her books;
ANTHEM pub. 1945 which is a novel nice & short
& her attempt at philosophy : FOR THE NEW INTELLECTUAL; THE PHILOSOPHY OF AYN RAND, pub. 1961

Anyway that's all for now,
Here's hoping they don't drop the big one soon-
GORD.

"GOOD NEWS" VERSUS IRAQI MASSACRES ,TORTURE & US TRAINED DEATH SQUADS & NUKING IRAN & NEO-CONS & RANT ON AYN RAND & HARPER BUSH' S PUPPET

DONALD RUMSFELD BLAMING THE MEDIA FOR NOT TELLING THE GOOD NEWS ABOUT THE IRAQI WAR ???
Posted by Picasa

GUERNICA ,SPAIN AFTER ATTACK BY FASCHIST AIRFORCE 1937. COMPARED TO THE DESTRUCTION OF FALLUJAH IRAQ 2004.
Posted by Picasa

IMAGE FROM SATYRICAL SITE INFINITEJEST.ORG
Posted by Picasa

IMAGE FROM SATYRICAL SITE INFINITEJEST.ORG
Posted by Picasa

IMAGE FROM SATYRICAL SITE INFINITE JEST.ORG
Posted by Picasa

Anyway here is my rant for the day as I try to summarize the events of the last couple of weeks & the last six years of the Bush Administration & the Insane world we live in and some strange digressions & twists & turns into the Rabbit Hole or through the Looking Glass as Prime Minister Harper begins to act Like George Bush’s twin brother or doppelganger ???

As Gwynne Dyer says about the Bush Administration in a recent article about US plans to attack Iran:
Logic out the window at the White House
By Gwynne Dyer

03/09/06 "Cyprus Mail" -- --
" The biggest pitfall in predicting the behavior of radical groups like the inner circle of the Bush administration is that you keep telling yourself that they would never actually do whatever it is they’re talking about. Surely they must realize that acting like that would cause a disaster. Then they go right ahead and do it."

And as for President Bush renewing THE PATRIOT ACT
Bush Signs New Version of Patriot Act
By Bill Brubaker
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 9, 2006; 5:21 PM

Critics, such as Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (D-Ohio), say the legislation violates Americans' civil liberties.

"It has become crystal clear that this administration is currently and will continue to abuse, attack and outright deny the civil liberties of the people of this country in defiance of our constitution," Kucinich said Tuesday during debate on the House floor. "The administration is illegally wiretapping American citizens, illegally collecting information on peace groups and illegally signing statements to ignore the torture ban recently enacted by this Congress. . . .

"The administration has violated the laws Congress has passed and is trampling on [the] constitution of the United States."

Ex-Justice Lawyer Rips Case for Spying
White House's Legal Justifications Called Weak
By Dan Eggen and Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, March 9, 2006; Page A03

A former senior national security lawyer at the Justice Department is highly critical of some of the Bush administration's key legal justifications for warrantless spying, saying that many of the government's arguments are weak and unlikely to be endorsed by the courts, according to documents released yesterday.

David S. Kris, a former associate deputy attorney general who now works at Time Warner Inc., concludes that a National Security Agency domestic spying program is clearly covered by a 1978 law governing clandestine surveillance, according to a legal analysis and e-mails sent to current Justice officials.

It appears that Islamaphobia is on the rise according to recent public opinion polls.
see for instance:
Negative Perception Of Islam Increasing
Poll Numbers in U.S. Higher Than in 2001
By Claudia Deane and Darryl Fears
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, March 9, 2006; Page A01

"As the war in Iraq grinds into its fourth year, a growing proportion of Americans are expressing unfavorable views of Islam, and a majority now say that Muslims are disproportionately prone to violence, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

The poll found that nearly half of Americans -- 46 percent -- have a negative view of Islam, seven percentage points higher than in the tense months after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, when Muslims were often targeted for violence."

and further:
ISLAMAPHOBIA masquerading as free speech
Soumaya Ghannoushi
aljazeera march 4, 2006

We are told we live in an open society which promotes tolerance for people of differing faiths & cultures. In a pluralistic & multicultural society we should respect those who are different from ourselves. It would be nice if this were always true.
I have tried to put forth an argument promoting not just tolerance of other faiths but also understanding & compassion for the Other. This means that it is our responsibility to educate ourselves about the various religions & cultures of other members of our society. It would be great in my view if our Public School system did a better job of teaching about the various world religions , their beliefs & their history. To teach the History of the world or even of Western Civilization one must also teach about the religions which were & are part of that history IE. Christianity, Islam & Judaism etc.
This is especially important at the moment as the US & its allies prepare to attack Iran. So why Iran ? well it is a Muslim country & Islam we are told is the enemy of the West. The day after 9/11 George W. Bush declared war on all of Islam when he called it a CRUSADE. He also made the unfortunate remark that nations are either on the side of the US or are the enemies of the US. But the world of politics does not work in such black & white terms.
Since then he has at times tempered his remarks making a distinction between Islamic terrorist & the majority of Muslims who do not support the terrorist.

Anyway the Bush administration's invasion of Iraq has not gone as smoothly as Bush & his advisors publicly promised it would. The so called insurgency has gotten worse rather than better. Soldiers & innocent civilians are dying every day. The US Forces & their Iraqi underlings are still arresting individuals denying them their rights under the Geneva convention & other international agreements . They believe they have the right to illegally detain individuals & to torture them if they wish to. At the same time there are Death Squads operating within Iraq which have murdered at least 5,000 civilians including scientist & academics , members of the media & anyone who opposes or criticizes the US Occupation of Iraq. The war in Iraq is reminiscent of Vietnam War & the brutal war the US fought in El Salvador & other Latin American nations.
Though Donald Rumsfeld says the main problem in Iraq is the negative news stories being turned-out by the nasty liberal anti-Bush media. I think that in fact the media coverage of the Iraqi War has been far too pro-American & shies away again & again from the more brutal side of the war committed by the US & its Iraqi stooges.

see on the Vietnam parallels :
http://mediachannel.org/blog/node/3652
Good Mourning, Vietnam
Submitted by editor4 on March 10, 2006 - 5:28pm.
By Greg Mitchell
Source: Editor & Publisher


see article from GLOBAL RESEARCH . ca
PROJECT CENSORED
http://www.projectcensored.org/
Nuclear War against Iran
by Michel Chossudovsky
January 3, 2006
GlobalResearch.ca

and on the destruction of the city of FALLUJAH & the massacres committed by US Forces see:

The Invasion of Falluja: A Study in the Subversion of Truth
http://www.afsc.org/pwork/ december/January 2004-2005
Mary Trotochaud and Rick McDowell are the American Friends Service Committee's representatives in Iraq. Their home is in Baghdad, but they are temporarily living in Amman, Jordan.

and: MASSACRES of Peaceful Protestors similar to that of Bloody Sunday in Ireland
News & Analysis
Turning Point Fallujah: How US Atrocities Sparked The Iraqi Resistance
Milan Rai, Electronic Iraq, 4 May 2005



I am not surprised that the Bush administration is about to do it again playing the American people & the Europeans & the UN as he & his administration did before invading Iraq & they are at it again as they are about to attack Iran using so called "surgical strikes " using conventional weapons or Mini-Nukes it seems Bush will just toss a coin to decide.
But what is a little more surprising is that Hilary Clinton & the Democrats are also urging a military strike on Iran . Well he fooled them over Iraq now he is going to fool them over Iran.
Why attack Iran? Well they are developing their Nuclear Energy Program & the US fears supposedly that Iran will start producing Nuclear Weapons, oh my.
But Pakistan & India have nuclear weapons so do the French & the British & the Americans & the Russians & Israel- why didn't they stop Pakistan or Israel two very unstable states & both are quite reckless. Pakistan also has hidden thousands of terrorist . Iran knows it would be decimated by the Israelis if Iran even got close to building a Nuclear Bomb .

But lets throw this into the mix the Dubai deal or failed deal. For once Hilary Clinton & the Democrats stood up to President Bush but was it the right issue to fight him on . There's the rub. Good grief am I siding with Bush. Sort of.
There has been a rise in mistrust & fear & hatred of all things Arab or Muslim. This is understandable after some five years of a steady diet of Maledicta towards Islam. So we have parochialism & at worst racism which plays a big part behind all the fuss over the Dubai contract. They didn't want a company from an Arab state to run some port facilities in the US which might they claim jeopardize US port security. Now so what message does this send to the Arab & Muslim world another insult which says that no Arab owned companies can be trusted to operate inside the US & will Britain follow suit or Canada or the European countries.
The irony is that Bush is the one who has created this hostile climate towards Arabs & Muslims so why would he do it because to him maybe it was just business as usual I don't know if it is as cynical as his grand dad did still doing business with German firms while the US & Nazi Germany were at war. But I don't buy the Big Conspiracy theory that Poppa Bush supported Hitler's policies he was just a cynical businessman doing business .
Like Randolph Hearst he was just doing business both probably great Heroes to the followers of Ayn Rand. It would appear many of the Neo-cons including some members of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Cabinet are followers of the novelist & philosopher Ayn Rand so they believe comes before everything profit wealth & happiness are their only goals.
Ayn Rand believed America to be the Greatest country in the world & that its duty was to promote democracy & capitalism & to take control of the rest of the world (which is filled with savages ) to promote its own interest .
But she also was an atheist who preached that religion was anti-rational & is a vestige of mankind's savage past. It is man's reason she argues which places him above all other creatures. One could call her & her followers as the Atheists on the RIGHT as opposed to those Atheist on the Left who refer to themselves as rationalist & Humanists. She also developed a hierarchy of those who are the true forces behind the success of America which is the elite of businessmen , technocrats architects & artists who provide their services to society in exchange for material wealth or profit if you will.
She attacks the working class for expecting higher wages & benefits. Since they are not the real producers of wealth & should learn to know their place or station in society. ( Their place to her is that of those sad robotic workers envisioned in Fritz Lang’s great silent film METROPOLIS.
It is odd how such Neo-cons who are followers of Ayn Rand could have joined forces with the Religious Right.
They want religion to be allowed to play a bigger part in American society.
though they both dislike the poor & the weak & the mentally or physically disabled & both believe in unfettered capitalism.
Ayn rand says the wealthy have earned their wealth through their superiour mental abilities whereas the religious right claim the rich are rich because they are being rewarded by God & the poor are unworthy of God ignoring Jesus" teaching on the matter since they follow the teachings of the old testament & the book of revelations more than the books of the apostles.
Now this brings us to the most extreme form of Protestant fundamentalism known as Reconstructionism & Dominionism but they a small minority within Protestant Fundamentalism but the concern is that some of their ideas & parts of their ideology is being bought into by others within the religious right & even some of the Neo-cons .

RECOSTRUCTIONISTS argue that the Bible is inerrant that it is the literal word of God & therefore it must be used as the source for the structure of society socially, politically legally & its economics & foreign affairs - since the US is the chosen nation of God it must spread its form of Christianity through out the world & convert the world to Christianity .

One wonders what society or the world will be like once the Neo-Conservatives & the Religious Right finally accomplish all their goals. The Mess in Iraq & the pitiful state of those whose lives were uprooted on the Gulf Coast by Hurricane Katrina are the very real signs of their goals coming into fruition
But on a happier note the super-rich & powerful will be doing even better in the future.
anyway that 's enough for now.

GOOD NIGHT & GOOD LUCK
GORD.