Thursday, April 10, 2008

Max Mosley: Imperialism & Capitalism Exposed : Fast Cars Fast Women & Fascism

Is he a Nazi like his dear old dad ???
or like his hero Henry Ford ???

Max Mosley Nazi Sex Video at 23/6
Formula 1 Racing president Max Mosely was caught engaging in Nazi-themed sex with hookers.

FIA President Refuses To Resign Over Nazi-Inspired Orgy /Times/ Edward Gorman/ April 8, 2008

Check out the original News of the World report, which states:

Formula One motor racing chief Max Mosley is today exposed as a secret sado-masochist sex pervert.

The son of infamous British wartime fascist leader Oswald Mosley is filmed romping with five hookers at a depraved NAZI-STYLE orgy in a torture dungeon. Mosley-- a friend to F1 big names like Bernie Ecclestone and Lewis Hamilton-- barks ORDERS in GERMAN as he lashes girls wearing mock DEATH CAMP uniforms and enjoys being whipped until he BLEEDS.

The multi-millionaire son of Sir Oswald, who was a pal of Adolf Hitler, plays a concentration camp commandant in a FIVE-HOUR torture chamber video.

At one point the wrinkled 67-year-old--who publicly likes to give the impression he has put his father's evil legacy behind him--yells "she needs more of ze punishment!" while brandishing a LEATHER STRAP over a brunette's naked bottom.

So Max Mosley is into Sado-masochism big deal.
The real problem here is that he agreed to have this video taped and that it has this Nazis theme to it .It is odd that the hookers are dressed as if they were in a Nazi Death Camp . Does Mosley get off on the idea of a few million Jews being brutalized and then gassed. He also doesn't just play the victim but is also a victimizer. He gets to play a Nazi that is like any good capitalist a Nazi or something akin to it.

Does Mosley like his father think the Nazis were in fact the good guys. This is not surprising since there are probably a large proportion of rich white people who think the British and Americans should have allied with Hitler.

We know for instance that George Bush's grandfather and the Iconic Industrialist Henry Ford were supporters of Hitler . Henry Ford wrote letters to Hitler supporting him and gave Hitler and his Nazi Party financial help. But Ford went further by using his newspaper the Dearborn Press to spread the lies of the notorious anti-semitic forgery " The Protocols of the Elders of Zion " .

Henry Ford ( see note below ) was in fact fanatically anti-Semitic. Besides financing Hitler and the Nazis in Germany he also helped the fanatical anti-Semitic popular radio personality Father Coughlin **(see Note #2)who used his radio-program in the 1930s to spread the most vicious lies against the Jewish people . But the history books in America or Canada do not mention such facts about the likes of Henry Ford who is seen as quintessentially American. If he is then according to logic Anti-Semitism must also be quintessentially American. I believe at that time it was: though it may not be today.

For most people in Western Civilization Anti-Semitism up to recent times was just part of one's upbringing it came with their mother's milk as it were. To not be anti-Semitic at least to some extent was seen as odd. In the same way racism of all sorts and sexism and homophobia etc. were just part and parcel of our so-called enlightened civilized society.

What our civilization cherished was tradition and conformity and the belief that the White Man was superior to all other peoples . This was and is an arrogant view of a narrow minded people. Yet even today we hear similar views being promulgated by our so called leaders and by the media and academics who stereotype all Muslims as being backward and fanatical . Or we are told that the people of Iraq are too primitive , too tribalistic and ignorant to appreciate what America did for the Iraqi people by ousting Saddam.

The American soldiers in Iraq have been trained and taught that all the Iraqis are their enemy and that they the Iraqis are blood-thirsty people who have no respect for human life. So the soldiers refer to the Iraqis as ' Haj' which is equivalent to 'Gook' as in Vietnamese or ' Nigger' for a black person or the British when they had their Empire spreading their own vicious form of racism and imperialism called various people ' wogs ' , ' kafirs ' , ' gyps' , ' nips ' , ' japs ', ' krauts '.
But of course we are not supposed to mention such things . We are told that our society was never really that racist. And we are supposed to tell our children and grandchildren that it was only those few bad-apples who ever preached such hate.

For history is forever being re-edited to suit those in power. Even as we speak history is being re-written again and again to prove how enlightened the Americans have always been and always will be. In the same way many still refer to the British Empire as if it were benevolent and that its purpose was not to plunder but to spread knowledge and to improve the lives of those whom they had conquered. But I'm sure there are those who would defend the various European Empires as being in some way benevolent such as the Dutch, the Spanish the Portuguese , the French , the Germans etc.

They will instead point out the evils for instance of the Ottoman Empire but not the evils of the British Empire . Though the British murdered and enslaved and oppressed a hundred million or more during its hey-day. But that we are told was all for the good. It's like those who think the death of millions of Native Americans was inevitable and all for the good since it meant that Europeans who were superior were able to explore and grow in numbers and bring the ' Word of God ' ( that is their version ) to the so called Heathens. The American Institution of Slavery was also justified because those Africans they claimed were not even capable of human speech or writing or real culture and so had been put on the earth by God for the White Man / White Europeans to use as labor.

The Bush Regime has now convinced a large proportion of the American populace that Iraqis are not like them and so can not be trusted to take care of their own problems . Well if the Americans hadn't bombed the shit out of Iraq forcing over three million Iraqis into exile most of whom are among the most well educated Iraqis maybe they could regroup and start over.
Though the people of Iraq are not permitted to have their own truly independent government , nor are they allowed basic human rights such as freedom of the press or freedom of speech or the right to travel within their own country or be out after curfew or the right to bare arms . This last one is particularly ironic since conservative and neoconservative Americans are always foaming at the mouth over what they see as their basic right which is the right to bare arms. With an armed populace they claim no tyrant can ever take over America. Yet they voted for a tyrant twice while he George W. Bush stole the election and has trampled upon the Constitution and the American Bill of Rights.

Of course according to Bush , Cheney and General Petreaus the whole problem with Iraq now is the government of Iran. And as Bush & co. toss the facts down the memory hole we are told that Iran has always been the problem so we must drop a few nukes on them as soon as possible. Then we are told peace will finally arrive in the Middle East.

Capitalism at its worst : Mercenaries For Hire !!!

State Dept. Renews Blackwater Contract in Iraq PART 1/2Blackwater
Jeremy Scahill Confronts BlackWater Honchos

Posted by Jeremy Scahill, Huffington Post April 8, 2008.

"My question to you is, how many innocent Iraqis has your company killed?"

And here is another revealing article about the use of torture by the American Military and CIA and those they contract such tasks out to and those governments or agencies who are only too glad to torture a few people guilty or not.

"The Blueprint That Led to Abu Ghraib"

The Progress Report. Posted April 8, 2008.

The Department of Justice memo released last week is a chilling -- and revealing -- look at the Bush administration's torture policy.

Last Tuesday, the Defense and Justice Departments released a previously-classified 2003 memo, which claimed that "federal laws prohibiting assault, maiming and other crimes did not apply to military interrogators who questioned al-Qaeda captives because the president's ultimate authority as commander in chief overrode such statutes." Written by John Yoo, who was then the deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), the memo is "similar [to], although much broader" than, the infamous 2002 torture memo, which was co-written by Yoo and redefined torture to be only "equivalent in intensity to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death." In the 2003 memo, Yoo also asserted that "many American and international laws would not apply to interrogations overseas" because they "would be unconstitutional as applied in this context." Like its 2002 predecessor, Yoo's 2003 memo was rescinded by Jack Goldsmith when he took over the OLC in December 2003 because of "the unusual lack of care and sobriety in their legal analysis." Even though many legal experts, such as former Army judge advocate general Thomas Romig, find Yoo's argument that "there are no rules in a time of war" to be "downright offensive," Yoo defends his memos as "near boilerplate." Far from seeing it as "boilerplate," former OLC lawyer Martin Lederman argues that Yoo's 2003 memo "is the source of the Nile for the abuse that occurred in Iraq in 2003."

CREATING THE "CULTURE OF ABUSE": According to "some legal experts and advocates" who spoke to The New York Times, Yoo's 2003 memo "adds to evidence that the abuse of prisoners in military custody may have involved signals from higher officials and not just irresponsible actions by low-level personnel." Noting that OLC opinions are "binding on the Defense Department," Scott Silliman, the head of the Center on Law, Ethics and National Security at Duke University and a former Air Force lawyer," says Yoo's memo "effectively sidelined military lawyers who strongly opposed harsh interrogation methods." "The memo helped to build a culture that, in the absence of leadership from the highest ranks of the Pentagon, allowed the abuses at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere," Silliman told the Times. Yoo rejects the idea that his legal opinions have any relation to detainee abuses that occurred in Iraq. "The 'culture of abuse' theory has no reliable evidence to support it," Yoo told The New York Times. But Lederman believes that Yoo's 2003 memo is "the blueprint that led to Abu Ghraib and the other abuses within the armed forces in 2003 and early 2004." His thesis is supported by the timeline of events surrounding the administration's deliberations on interrogation policy and the abuses at Abu Ghraib. According to Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba's report on Abu Ghraib, the "sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses" at the prison took place between October 2003 and December 2003, which was after Yoo issued his memo but before it was rescinded by Goldsmith.

FOURTH AMENDMENT FOOTNOTE: The release of Yoo's 2003 memo on interrogation also led to the revelation of another wide-ranging Bush administration legal opinion which claimed the war on terror trumped constitutional protections. A footnote in the 2003 memo states that the OLC "concluded that the Fourth Amendment had no application to domestic military operations." The footnote is referring to an October 2001 memo written by Yoo that "focused on the rules governing any deployment of U.S. forces inside the country 'in the event of further large-scale terrorist activities' by al-Qaeda."
Update 9:53 pm

* Note : Anyway for those who claim that Henry Ford was such a great role model for their children think again . He was a nast mean-spirited racist nut job. But we are not supposed to speak the truth about him or other so-called American heroes.

Henry Ford and Anti-Semitism THE INTERNATIONAL JEW,
THE WORLD'S FOREMOST PROBLEM /Abridged from the original as published by the world renowned industrial leader,

See article from: Anti-Defamation League about the revival of anti-semitic articles by Henry Ford originally published in his newspaper the Deearborn Press The International Jew/Anti-Semitism from the Roaring Twenties Revived on the Web Ford's articles were based on the forgery The Protocols of the Elders of Zion . The protocols were invented for the most part by the Tsar of Russia's secret police

The Dearborn Independent

The Dearborn Publishing Company published The Dearborn Independent newspaper. At the peak of its popularity, the Dearborn, Michigan paper, owned by auto magnate Henry Ford Sr., boasted a circulation of 700,000. The Dearborn Independent first attacked Jews in its May 22, 1920 issue and continued to do so in 91 subsequent editions.

Many of the paper's anti-Semitic articles were reprinted by the Dearborn Publishing Company in four paper-bound volumes: The International Jew, the World. s Foremost Problem (November, 1920); Jewish Activities in the United States (April, 1921); Jewish Influences in American Life (November, 1921); and Aspects of Jewish Power in the United States (May, 1922). Collectively known as The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem, these volumes were later published in a variety of languages and disseminated widely in the United States and abroad.

For decades, The International Jew has been in the public domain. It can be reprinted by anyone who wishes to do so. In the late 1950s, anti-Semite Gerald L.K. Smith edited and published an abridged version of The International Jew culled from the original Dearborn Independent articles. The complete text of Smith's version now is easily found at many hate sites on the World Wide Web.

Update: 1030 PM

**Note #2 Coughlin - Facing the Corporate Roots of American Fascism/Father Charles Edward Coughlin (1891-1971)

By Richard Sanders, Editor, Press for Conversion!

Father Coughlin, “the Father of Hate Radio,” was born in Hamilton, Ontario. This rabidly right-wing, Catholic priest started with a weekly broadcast on WJR, Detroit’s “Good Will” station. CBS broadcast it nationwide in 1930 and 1931. He started his own radio network that grew to 30 stations. John Spivak, estimated that Coughlin’s broadcasts reached 40 million, said: “Only the President…had a bigger audience… The President spoke only on special occasions, the priest every Sunday…. To me, he was the most dangerous divisive influence in the country” (A Man in His Time, 1967).

Coughlin originally supported FDR, but turned against him in 1934 and created a political party, the National Union of Social Justice. Former Louisiana Governor, Huey Long was supposed to be their candidate, but he was assassinated in 1935. Journalist George Seldes said Long was America’s “first notable Fascist leader,...a very smart demagogue, [who] once said, ‘Sure we’ll have Fascism here, but it will come as an anti-Fascism movement.’” In the late 1930s, Coughlin called for FDR’s impeachment because he was “leaning toward international socialism or sovietism.”

Coughlin’s radio sermons praised Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini. The Nazi press praised Coughlin as “America’s most powerful radio commentator.” He ranted against Jews, the “Christ-killers and Christ-rejecters.” When a Boston Globe reporter asked him for proof that communists were influencing FDR, Father Coughlin belted the journalist in the face.

Coughlin's weekly paper, Social Justice, reached one million. It was sold in 2,000 churches. In 1938, it reprinted the anti-Semitic forgery “Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”

also see my previous posts on anti-Semitism and the forgery The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

and so it goes ,

No comments: